I recently started to study hypothesis testing. I find out that "The power of a hypothesis test is the probability that the decision rule leads to the right conclusion when the null is false."
so based on my search, I find that in order to calculate the probability of detection or power we should use the below formula
$$\int_ξ^\infty p(x|H1) \,dx$$
here x is our sample or data and H1 is alternative hypothesis and is threshold level
but when I tried to read another subject, such as proof of Neyman Pearson Lemma theorem, I saw that the power or power function defined as
$$E_\Theta[φ(X)]$$
( φ is Test statistic and Theta is model's Parameters (Theta1 is parameter value when alternative hypothesis is true and Theta0 is model parameter when null hypothesis is the correct one)).
which I find confusing, so my question is:
Are these two mentioned formulas the same?
and
How we calculate power based on which formula?
You show formulas without definitions of symbols, and with no work of your own. So it is difficult to assess what you understand and what you don't. Here is a discussion of a very simple situation in which everything can be calculated using binomial distributions. I hope it is helpful.
Suppose you flip a coin $n=50$ times, suspecting it may be biased towards Tails. You will test $H_0: p = .5$ against $H_a: p \le .5,$ rejecting $H_0$ if the number $X$ of Heads in 50 independent tosses is less than or equal to critical value $c = 18,$
Because $P(X \le c|H_0) = P(X \le c|p=.5) = 0.0325$ this is a test at level 3..25%. That is, the probability of Type I Error is $ 0.0325.$ Because of the discreteness, it is not possible to do a (nonrandomized) test at exactly the 5% level of significance. [Computation in R, where
pbinomis a binomial CDF.]To find the power against the specific alternative $p_a = .25,$ you need to find $P(X \le c|p=.25) = 0.9713.$ That is, the probability of Type II error is 1 - 0.9713 = 0.0287.
A power curve for this test would plot the probability of rejection against the specific alternative values $p_a$ of interest. A plot of this power curve is shown below the R code used to make it. The dotted red line shows power at $p_a = .25,$ computed just above.
[To make a power curve with a calculator, you could plot half a dozen carefully chosen points $p_a$ (instead of 401), connecting them with a hand-drawn curve.]