Could please someone explain why I can make Taylor expanding around s/N. What about states that s is almost equal to N?
2026-03-25 14:00:40.1774447240
Statistical Physics-Taylor expanding
147 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in PHYSICS
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Computing relative error with ideal gas law.
- Planetary orbits in a $4$-dimensional universe
- Applied Maths: Equations of Motion
- Return probability random walk
- What will be the velocity of a photon ejected from the surface of cesium by a photon with a frequency of 6.12E14 s^-1?
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Time when velocity of object is zero and position at that point in time
Related Questions in STATISTICAL-MECHANICS
- Return probability random walk
- Fermi/Bose gases
- motion on the surface of a 3-sphere
- Solving a symmetric pair of differential equations
- Why is it so difficult to sample from a Boltzmann distribution?
- Expectation value and variance of a spin system
- Cumulant equations of motion
- Proving that Shannon entropy is maximal for the uniform distribution using convexity
- Numerical integration of sharply peaking function: $\int_0^{1000} \exp(1000\sin(x)/x)\,{\rm d}x $
- I need to work out probability on a draw of 16 players (I am not a math fundi .. but i have a good grasp of the fundamentals)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

So this is not really rigorous; $s$ actually ranges all the way from $-N$ to $N$ so that $s/N$ really ranges all the way from $-1$ to $1$. Near $s/N=0$, one can Taylor expand. Traditionally we expand the logarithm and then exponentiate, since the logarithm is (quantitatively) smoother. This shows that the profile looks like a Gaussian near there.
For certain purposes that's plenty. To be rigorous you would want to ask: how near is "near"? And if there are values of $s$ which are not "near", what happens there?
There are different ways to handle that. One way would be just brute force estimation (try to take more derivatives of $\ln(P(d))$ and use the Lagrange error). Another way would be a quantitative central limit theorem, such as the Berry-Esseen theorem. Indeed $d$ is a sum of $N$ independent identically distributed variables which are uniformly distributed on $\{ a,-a \}$. The mean of this is zero; the variance is $a^2$; the third absolute moment is $a^3$. So the ratio $\frac{\rho}{\sigma^3}$ (using Wikipedia's notation) in the Berry-Esseen theorem is $1$. So the uniform error in the CLT approximation is less than $\frac{1}{2\sqrt{N}}$...but probably not by a whole lot, maybe an order of magnitude or so. An interesting question for an analyst or probabilist (not so much for a physicist) is where the error is maximized.