The following question appears in Isaacs' Finite Group Theory:
3B.15) (Berkovich) Let $G$ be solvable, and let $H<G$ be a proper subgroup having the smallest possible index in $G$. Show that $H\lhd G$.
If we assume that $G$ is a minimal counterexample, then it is possible to show that $H$ has trivial core in $G$, that $H$ is a complement of the Fitting subgroup of $G$, and that the Fitting subgroup is a unique minimal normal subgroup of $G$. But this mostly follows from the fact that $H$ must be a maximal subgroup of $G$, rather than using the fact that $H$ has smallest possible index. It also doesn't seem to lead to any contradiction.
I cannot find the solution. Problem 3B.12 from the same chapter is wrong, so there is the possibility that this question is wrong too. If it is wrong, are there any counterexamples?
So, using the action of $G$ on the cosets of $H$, we can regard $G$ as a subgroup of $S_n$, where $H=G_\alpha$ is a point stabilizer and $n=|G:H|$. The minimal normal subgroup $N$ is regular and abelian, so $|N|=n$.
Since $H \ne 1$, there is a point $\beta$ with $H_\beta \ne H$. Then $|H:H_\beta|$ is the length of the orbit of $H$ on $\beta$, and hence is less than $n$, so $|G:NH_\beta| < n$, contradicting the minimality of $n$.