Here's the question: is every finite group a subgroup of a symmetric group of sufficiently large order? More specifically, if a group $G$ has order $n$, then is it true that $G \le S_{n}$?
For instance, both groups of order $4$ can be found in $S_4$. $\{(1), (1 2 3 4), (1 3)(2 4), (1 4 3 2)\} \cong C_4$ and $\{(1), (1 2), (3 4), (1 2)(3 4)\} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$. Also, in general, $C_n, A_n, D_{2n}, S_n \le S_n$.
After a short investigation, I was unable to find a subgroup in $S_4$ that was congruent to $Q$, the unit quaternions, but I would be quite surprised if $Q \not\le S_8$.
Okay, the answer is "yes", and this is known as Cayley's Theorem. However, the link points to a proof-less page and the proofs given on Wikipedia aren't very clear, so I would really, really appreciate a clear, intuitive, and conceptual proof of Cayley's Theorem.
The intuation is that $$gG=G$$ for any $g\in G$ which means that every $g$ of permutes the elements of $G$. Surprisingly the corresponding permutations elements constitute a subgroup of $S_G$ which is isomorphic to $G$.
If $G$ is simple, $G$ can be embeded into $A_n$ where $n$ is the smallest index of nontrivial subgroup of $G$.