Is spectral norm (i.e. the maximum singular value of a matrix) submultiplicative? I am absolutely confused. How to express the singular value of the product of matrices in terms of that of the original matrices? Please help.
2026-03-24 23:45:12.1774395912
Submultiplicavity of spectral norm
964 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in SINGULAR-VALUES
- Singular Values of a rectangular matrix
- Connection between singular values, condition and well-posedness
- Does the product of singular values of a rectangular matrix have a simple expression?
- Clarification on the SVD of a complex matrix
- Intuitive explanation of the singular values
- What are the characteristics that we can use to identify polynomials that have singular points?
- Zolotarev number and commuting matrices
- Spectral norm of block and square matrices
- Why is the Schmidt decomposition of an operator not unique?
- Smallest singular value of full column rank matrix
Related Questions in MATRIX-NORMS
- Inequality regarding norm of a positive definite matrix
- Operator norm calculation for simple matrix
- Equivalence of computing trace norm of matrix
- Spectral norm minimization
- Frobenius and operator norms of rank 1 matrices
- Prove the induced matrix norm $\|A\|_\infty = \max_i \| a^*_i \|_1$
- $l_2 \rightarrow l_\infty$ induced matrix norm
- Is it possible to upper bound this family of matrices in operator norm?
- Upper bound this family of matrices in induced $2$-norm
- Operator norm (induced $2$-norm) of a Kronecker tensor
Related Questions in SPECTRAL-NORM
- Operator norm calculation for simple matrix
- Is the spectral norm of the Jacobian of an $M$-Lipschitz function bounded by $M$?
- Does Lipschitz-continuous gradient imply that the Hessian is bounded in spectral norm by the same Lipschitz constant?
- Spectral norm minimization
- Gradient of the spectral norm of a matrix
- Is it possible to upper bound this family of matrices in operator norm?
- The spectral norm of real matrices with positive entries is increasing in its entries?
- Computing the spectral norm of a projection matrix
- Fastest converging algorithm for computing spectral radius of symmetric matrix
- $2$-norm of a Vandermonde matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well, the spetral norm is then norm induced by the euclidean norm for vectors. I'm not sure if you are already supposed to know/use that fact, vs the definition using singular values. That means, if $A,B$ are square matrices and $x$ is a compatible vector, then
$$\lVert (AB)x\rVert_2 \le \lVert (AB)\rVert_2 \lVert x\rVert_2 $$
is true for all $A,B,x$ and when fixing $AB$, there is an $x_0\neq \vec0$ where equality holds.
OTOH, we also have
$$\lVert (AB)x\rVert_2 = \lVert A(Bx)\rVert_2\lVert \le \lVert A\rVert_2\lVert (Bx)\rVert_2 \le \lVert A\rVert_2\lVert B\rVert_2\lVert x\rVert_2$$
for all $A,B,x$. Setting $x=x_0$ with the above given $x_0$, we finally have
$$\lVert (AB)\rVert_2 \lVert x_0\rVert_2 = \lVert (AB)x_0\rVert_2 \le \lVert A\rVert_2\lVert B\rVert_2\lVert x_0\rVert_2.$$
If we now divide by $\lVert x_0\rVert_2 \neq 0$, we get the submultiplicativity.
Note that this does not use anything special about the euclidean vector norm $\lVert x\rVert_2$, the proof is valid for any vector norm and the induced matrix norm.
If you want a proof of the fact that the matrix norm induced by the euclidean vector norm is indeed the spectral norm, take a look here: Proving definition of norms induced by vector norms