This something like Waring meets the primes. Take some prime p(n) and divide it by all the primes less than one-half p(n) to find the sum of the remainders that are themselves also primes. Is there some sum of these remainders for p(s1) that is greater than p(n) for all subsequent primes greater than p(n)? Is there some p(s2) such than all primes greater than p(s2) will have a sum of remainders twice p(s2)? Some p(s3) for three times the sum of all its prime remainders for all primes greater than p(s3)? This could be continued for some p(s4), [p(s5)... Do you know if anyone has investigated this?
2026-03-28 15:20:12.1774711212
Sum of prime remainders is greater than prime p
131 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PRIME-NUMBERS
- New prime number
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- I'm having a problem interpreting and starting this problem with primes.
- Decimal expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$: what is its period?
- Multiplying prime numbers
- Find the number of relatively prime numbers from $10$ to $100$
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Squares of two coprime numbers
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is a totally heuristic non-rigorous attempt.
For a prime $p$, there are about $n =\dfrac{p}{2 \ln p}$ primes less than $p/2$.
For each of these primes, say $q$, the probability of the remainder being prime is about $\dfrac{1}{\ln q}$.
Therefore the sum of these remainders is about $\sum_{q < p/2} \dfrac{q}{\ln q} \sim \left(\dfrac{p}{2\ln p}\right)^2 $.
This is larger than $p$ by a factor of $\dfrac{p}{(2\ln p)^2}$ which is greater than $1$, so the sum is usually much greater than $p$.