I read about asymptotic notation .I understood the limit definition of big oh notation.But while going about calculating O(1)+O(2)+.......…..+O(n),the sum comes out to be O(n ^2).Can anyone explain the same?
2026-05-06 02:27:24.1778034444
Summation of big oh terms
465 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ASYMPTOTICS
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- How to find the asymptotic behaviour of $(y'')^2=y'+y$ as $x$ tends to $\infty$?
- Correct way to prove Big O statement
- Proving big theta notation?
- Asymptotics for partial sum of product of binomial coefficients
- Little oh notation
- Recurrence Relation for Towers of Hanoi
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- What's wrong with the boundary condition of this $1$st order ODE?
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Due to the fact that $O(c) = O(1)$ where $c$ is any constant, I think your concern is this: if $f(n) = O(n)$ and if $$g(n) = \sum_{i=1}^n f(i)$$ then why is it true that $g(n) = O(n^2)$?
It is misleading to write something like $$g(n) = \sum_{i=1}^n O(i).$$ We do not view each particular instance of $f(i)$ as being $O(i)$; the statement $f(n) = O(n)$ is a statement about $f$ as a function of $n$, not about $f$ at any particular value.
So how do we go about proving that $g(n) = O(n^2)$? Well, because $f$ is $O(n)$, there exist constants $C$ and $n_0$ such that $|f(n)| \ge Cn$ for all $n \ge n_0$. So for $n \ge n_0$, we split the sum and use the triangle inequality to approximate: $$|g(n)| \le \sum_{i=1}^{n_0-1} |f(i)| + \sum_{i=n_0}^n |f(i)| \le C' + \sum_{i=n_0}^n Ci.\tag{1}$$ Here $C'$ is just the constant value of the first $n_0$ terms. We're allowed to be very loose in our estimates, so in the second sum in (1) we'll throw back in the numbers from $1$ to $n_0-1$ to get an even bigger bound: $$|g(n)| \le C' + C \sum_{i=1}^n i = C' + \frac{Cn(n+1)}{2}.\tag{2}$$ It should be clear now that the right hand side of (2) is $O(n^2)$, by which I mean it is bounded by a constant multiple of $n^2$. Indeed, $$C' + \frac{C}{2}(n(n+1)) = C' + \frac{C}{2}(n^2 + n) \le C'n^2 + \frac{C}{2}(n^2 + n^2) = (C' + C)n^2.$$