I'm working on Ted Siders Logic for Philosophers and I'm stuck on exercise 3.15.
I need to show the global and local definitions of supervaluational semantic consequence are equivalent. How do I go about getting started on this?
I'm working on Ted Siders Logic for Philosophers and I'm stuck on exercise 3.15.
I need to show the global and local definitions of supervaluational semantic consequence are equivalent. How do I go about getting started on this?
HINT
Local implies global.
According to the "local" definition of semantic consequence [Exercise 3.14, page 103] :
We can "semi-formalize" the above definition as follows :
Using the following property of quantifiers :
we can derive from the above definition :
But, applying the definition of page 101 :
we can rewrite the above condition as :
and this one is the "global" definition of supervaluational semantic consequence : $\Gamma \vDash_S \phi$ of page 101.