My intuition is that the answer is affirmative. I have shown that a Banach space $X$ is reflexive iff the closed unit ball of $X$ is weakly compact. I was trying to use this, but it hasn't been a success so far.
2026-02-23 08:28:29.1771835309
Suppose $X$ is a Banach space and $Y$ is a closed subspace. If $Y$ and $X{/}Y$ are reflexive, then is $X$ also reflexive?
498 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Related Questions in REFLEXIVE-SPACE
- Weak convergence in a reflexive, separable and infinite Banach space.
- Weak and Weak* convergences implying reflexivity
- Non-Reflexivity of $L^1$ by finding a particular operator in the dual space?
- My attempt to show the canonical embedding $c_0\rightarrow c_0^{**}$ is not surjective?
- Is the Unit ball of $X^{**} $ weak*- sequentially compact?
- How to get $\ell_1$ is not reflexive from $c_0^*$ is not reflexive?
- Example on $X^*$ is reflexive but $\sigma(X^*,X)\neq\sigma(X^*,X^{**})$ for a normed space $X$.
- A direct example on $X^*$ is reflexive but the weak topology and weak* topology on $X^*$ are not equal for a normed space $X$.
- How to show a normed space $X$ is reflexive if the weak topology and weak* topology on $X^*$ are equal?
- Bounded sequence has Cauchy subsequence w.r.t. $ (x|y)_0:=\sum^\infty_{n=1} 2^{-n}\phi_n(x)\phi_n(y).$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes. More generally: If $X$ is a Banach space and $M$ is a closed subspace, then, if two out of three of $X,M,X/M$ are reflexive, then all three are reflexive. This is a result of Krein and Smulian from the 1940's, it is not trivial.
We need two lemmas that I leave as exercises, they must be easy to you:
(1) If $X$ is a Banach space and $M$ is a closed subspace, then define $M^\bot=\{\varphi\in X^*: \varphi\vert_{M}=0\}$. Then $M^\bot$ is a closed subspace of $X^*$ and $X^*/M^\bot\cong M^*$ (via the map $R$ acting as $\varphi+M^\bot\mapsto\varphi\vert_M$).
(2) If $X$ is a Banach space and $M$ is a closed subspace, then $(X/M)^*\cong M^\bot$ (via the map $S$ acting as $\varphi\mapsto \varphi\circ q$, $q:X\to X/M$ is the quotient map). Obviously, the inverse of $S$ is the map $\tau\mapsto S^{-1}(\tau)$ defined as $S^{-1}(\tau)(x+M)=\tau(x)$ for all $x\in X$.
Now suppose that $M$ and $X/M$ are reflexive spaces. Let $\chi\in X^{**}$. We want to show that this is the evaluation at some $x\in X$. Let's do it:
Define $\xi:(X/M)^*\to\mathbb{C}$ by $\xi(\varphi)=\chi(\varphi\circ q)$. As we said $\varphi\circ q\in M^\bot\subset X^*$, so our definition makes sense and actualy $\xi$ is bounded. By $X/M$'s reflexivity we may find $x_0+M\in X/M$ such that $\xi(\varphi)=\varphi(x_0+M)$ for all $\varphi\in (X/M)^*$. Note that this means that if $\tau\in M^\bot\subset X^{*}$ then $$\chi(\tau)=\chi(SS^{-1}(\tau))=\chi(S^{-1}(\tau)\circ q)=S^{-1}(\tau)(x_0+M)=\tau(x_0).$$ Now setting $\omega:X^*\to\mathbb{C}$ by $\omega(\tau)=\chi(\tau)-\tau(x_0)$ we have that $\omega\vert_{M^\bot}=0$. Thus $\omega$ induces a functional $\Omega:X^*/M^\bot\to\mathbb{C}$ by $\Omega(\tau+M^\bot)=\omega(\tau)$. This is easily seen to be bounded, so $\Omega\in (X^*/M^\bot)^*$. By (1), we have that $(X^*/M^\bot)^*\cong M^{**}$ via the map $$(X^*/M^\bot)^*\ni\varphi\mapsto\varphi\circ R^{-1}\in M^{**}$$ but $M$ is reflexive. Thus we have a point $x_1\in M$ such that $\Omega\circ R^{-1}=\text{ev}_{x_1}$. Therefores $\Omega=\text{ev}_{x_1}\circ R$, so
$$\Omega(\tau+M^\bot)=R(\tau+M^\bot)(x_1)$$ so $$\omega(\tau)=\tau\vert_{M}(x_1)=\tau(x_1)$$ so $$\chi(\tau)-\tau(x_0)=\tau(x_1)$$ so $$\chi(\tau)=\tau(x_1+x_0)$$ and this is true for all $\tau\in X^*$, so we are done. $$\ $$