Supposed solution for the Poisson equation fulfills Laplace equation instead.

355 Views Asked by At

It seems basic, but I never understood properly. Suppose a spherical symmetric mass distribution, and a point outside the sphere. The gravitational field at the point can be calculated by summing all mass elements:$$\Phi = \int -\frac{Gdm}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r'|} = \int -\frac{G\rho}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r'|}dV$$ It is also the standard solution for the Poisson equation according to Wikipedia, where $f = -4\pi G\rho$.

Solving the integral, we get $$\Phi = -\frac{Gm}{r}$$ where m is the mass of the sphere and $r$ the distance to its center. But the Laplacian of this solution is zero. It fulfills the Laplace equation (where $f = 0$) and not the Poisson's (where $f = -4\pi G\rho$).

I think that it can the mathematical translation for the fact that if all mass were at a singularity (the center), the field would be the same. In this case $\rho(\mathbf r) = 0$ everywhere. But anyway there is the problem of the singularity where $\rho(\mathbf 0) = \infty$.

How to deal with this anomaly?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On

What do we know? We have a body, WLOG centered at the origin, with radius $R$, say. For simplicity, let's assume the body is small and dense enough (i.e, Mercury) for us to consider the mass distribution to be totally even. In other words, $$\rho(r)=\begin{cases}\rho &r\leq R \\0 & r>R \end{cases}$$ As we are aware, the potential $U$ satisfies $$\Delta U=4\pi G\rho$$ Outside the body, the density is zero, which reduces this to $$\Delta U_{\text{out}}=0$$ I'll let you check on your own that this is solved by $$U_{\text{out}}(r)=b_1+\frac{b_2}{r}$$ On the other hand, inside the body, the density is nonzero, so we have $$\Delta U_{\text{in}}=4\pi G\rho$$ Once again, I will let you check for yourself that this is solved by $$U_{\text{in}}(r)=a_1+\frac{a_2}{r}+\frac{2\pi G\rho r^2}{3}$$ As of now, we don't have enough information to uniquely specify the potential. We apply some physical conditions, imposing

  • $U$ is well-defined at the origin
  • And in particular $U(0)=0$. In physical terms, this means that it takes no work to move a particle at the origin, to the origin.
  • $U_{\text{in}}(R)=U_{\text{out}}(R)$, in other words, the inside and outside potential agree on the body's surface

You'll notice that these are only three conditions, but we have four unknown constants. This is fine - the thing we are truly interested in is the graviational field, $\boldsymbol g$ which is related to the potential via $$\boldsymbol g=-\nabla U$$ Because of this differentiation, we have some freedom up to shifting by a constant. So, we can, without loss of generality, decide to set $b_1=0$. The first two conditions impose $a_1=a_2=0$ so this reduces to $$U_{\text{in}}(r)=\frac{2\pi G\rho r^2}{3} \\ U_{\text{out}}(r)=\frac{b_2}{r}$$ Applying the matching condition, you can deduce $$b_2=\frac{2\pi G\rho R^3}{3}$$ And so $$\boxed{U(r)=\begin{cases}\frac{2\pi G\rho r^2}{3} & r\leq R \\ \frac{2\pi G\rho R^2}{3}\frac{R}{r}& r>R \end{cases}}$$