Let $A$ be a nonempty subset of the real numbers. Define the set $|A|$ to be $|A|:= \{|x| : x \in A\}$.
If the set $A$ is bounded, is the set $|A|$ bounded? If not, give an example. If so, by what? Explain.
An open bound is also bounded one, & both bounds can be open; still the set is bounded. Also, for one point sets, supremum (let, $s$) = infimum (let, $i$).
Yes, if a set is bounded, its modulus set too is. The possible cases for both supremum & infimum are:
(i) supremum $\le 0$:
As supremum $\ge $ infimum, infimum $\le 0$. $|A|$ is not including origin then. Say, $A = [-2, -1)$, hence does not contain $0$. The modulus should have all values in range |A|=(1,2]$
(ii) supremum $\ge 0$:
As supremum $\ge $ infimum, options are :
infimum $\le 0$. Say, $A = [-2, 1)$, so $0$ is in the set. Hence, $|A|=[0,2]$, but element $1$ is not in the set $|A|$. So, confused as the set $|A| = [0,1)\cup (1,2]$. So, in fact have two sets in $|A|$ if an open bound is now lying inside the new bounds. So, there should be infimum, supremum for two sets separately in $|A|$.
infimum $\ge 0$. Here, same as for $A$.
This is not a proof. While the statement you are trying to prove is correct, what you did here is only a demonstration of the claim on one particular set $A$. And, yes, sure, for $A=[-2,-1)$ it is true that $|A|$ is a bounded set. But how do you know that this is true for every bounded set $A$? How do you know there doesn't exist some very strange exotic set $A$ which is bounded, but $|A|$ is not bounded?
To actually prove the claim, you should:
In steps $1$ and $2$, you are not allowed to decide what $A$ will look like. All you are allowed to assume is that $A$ is a bounded set.
The actual steps of the proofs can differ, but the easiest way to prove it would be something like this. Note, I will not be doing all the work here. I am just giving you guidelines.
remember, in sentence $4$, you will get a sentence with this structure:
This can be proven by taking an arbitrary $x\in|A|$ and doing something with it.