Supremum of set in more than 2 dimensions: i.e. supremum of set in $\mathbb{R}^n$

771 Views Asked by At

Let us consider $\mathbb{R}^n, n\geq 2$. For simplicity, let's say $n=2$ (but I'm wondering about when $n>2$ as well). lets consider the set $$ Z=\{ (x,y)\mid x+y\leq 2\} $$

Does this set have a supremum? If so, what is it?

I am confused because there are point that are neither $\leq$ or $\geq$ other points. For example, $(2,0)$ has nothing greater than it. However, $(2,0)$ is neither $\leq$ or $\geq (0,2)$. So would these both be supremums, along with $(1,1), (1.5,.5)$ etc.? I guess the answer may be that $(2,2)$ is the supremum, which is not in this set, but then it seems that in higher dimensions the supremum would often not be in the set...

I guess, upon a little further thinking, my question is are points like $(2,0)$ that are in the boundary, but not greater than or equal to everything (because we are in higher dimensions) supremum or maximum?

Thanks.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

First you have do define an order on $\Bbb R^n$. In $\Bbb R^1$ we have the usual order, but in $\Bbb R^n$ there isn't one. You could use lexicographic order, where $(a,b) \gt (c,d)$ if $a \gt c$ or $a=c, b \gt d$. You also seem to be assuming that $x \ge 0$ and $y \ge 0$. In that case your $Z$ is an isosceles right triangle with corners $(0,0), (2,0), (0,2)$ In the lexicographic order, $(2,0)$ is the greatest point in or on the triangle and is the supremum. Alternately you could define a partial order as $(a,b) \gt (c,d)$ if $a \gt c$ and $ b \gt d$ In this case the supremum would be $(2,2)$ as that is the least point greater than all the points of the triangle. If you don't restrict to $x \ge 0, y \ge 0$ your set is the half plane below $x+y=2$ It does not have a supremum in either of these orders. The same thing happens in higher dimensions.