i'm stuck on a question where I have to explain the set theory notation of the syllogism below;
boats are vessles $(A ⊆ B)$
boats operate in water $(A ∈ C)$ or $(A ⊆ C)$
Some vessles operate in water $(B ∩ C ≠ \emptyset)$
The question my friends and I have had is surrounding the set notation to use for 'boats operate in water' - Some are of the assumption that we should use A ⊆ C, but i'm really stumped because I was under the assumption of using A ∈ C. We've all been back and forth about it and was just hoping to get some clarity on here for anyone that can help speculate, thank you.
"Boat are vessels" is $\forall x (\text {Boat}(x) \to \text {Vessel}(x))$ and this is equivalent, in set language, to :
The same for "Boats operate in water" : $\text {Boat} \subseteq \text {Water}$, because we can derive it as the conclusion of a Barbara-type syllogism whose second premise is : "Vessels operate in water", i.e. $\forall x (\text {Vessel}(x) \to \text {Water}(x))$.
Regarding "Some vessels operate in water", we have : $\exists x (\text {Boat}(x) \land \text {Water}(x))$.
This means that: $\text {for some } x : x \in \text {Boat} \text { and } x \in \text {Water}$ that, translated into set language, is as you said :