So possess a common zero, means $\exists x \in S^k: f_i(x) = 0$, right?
Then I could not follow this brief proof - what is the corollary? Because the information in the proof is so little, I couldn't even guess which.
Thanks =)
Theorem. Any $k$ smooth functions $f_1,\ldots, f_k$ on $S^k$ that satisfy the symmetry condition $f_i(-x)=-f_i(x)$, $i=1,\ldots, k$, must possess a common zero.
Proof. If not, apply the corallary to the map $$ f(x)=(f_1(x),\ldots, f_k(x),0),$$ taking the $x_{k+1}$ axis for $l$.
Edit: the corollary turns out to be the theorem mentioned in this question.
Yes, with this theorem (why do they call it corollary, then...?), it works exactly like they say, by contradiction. If the $f_j$'s don't vanish simultaneously, then $f$ takes $S^k$ to $\mathbb{R}^{k+1}\setminus\{0\}$, and satisfies the symmetry condition. So by the corollary-theorem, it must intersect in particular the line $\{x_1=\ldots=x_k=0\}$. But this gives a simultaneous zero. Contradiction.