Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane. Show that there are at most $O(n^{7/3})$ triangles of unit area whose vertices are from $P$ by using Szemeredi-Trotter theorem.
2026-03-25 19:02:22.1774465342
Szemerédi-Trotter theorem unit area triangles
226 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMBINATORIAL-GEOMETRY
- Properties of triangles with integer sides and area
- Selecting balls from infinite sample with certain conditions
- Number of ways to go from A to I
- A Combinatorial Geometry Problem With A Solution Using Extremal Principle
- Find the maximum possible number of points of intersection of perpendicular lines
- The generous lazy caterer
- Number of paths in a grid below a diagonal
- How many right triangles can be constructed?
- What is the exact value of the radius in the Six Disks Problem?
- Why are there topological no results on halfspace arrangements?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Sandeep has sketched the solution in the comments. Let me fill in the details (and also get this question out of the "unanswered questions" queue).
Let us recall the Szemerédi-Trotter theorem, first published in their paper Extremal problems in discrete geometry (Combinatorica 1983):
Theorem (Szemerédi and Trotter 1983) Suppose there are $n$ points and $\ell$ lines on the plane $\mathbb{R}^2$. The number of incidences between points and lines is at most $c( (n \ell)^{2/3} + n + \ell$) for some absolute constant $c>0$.
Here, an incidence just means a pair $(P, L)$ where $P$ is a point and $L$ is a line from our collection and $P\in L$. When $\ell=n$, we see that the number of incidences is $O( n^{4/3})$. Of course, when $\ell = 2n$ or more generally $\ell = \lambda n$ (for some fixed $\lambda$), then again the number of incidences is at most $O(n^{4/3})$. A particularly elegant proof of Szemerédi-Trotter theorem was given by Székely in his paper Crossing Numbers and Hard Erdös Problems in Discrete Geometry (Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 1993). Székely's proof used the crossing lemma (see here for a statement).
We can now prove the following result.
Proposition. Given $n$ points on the plane, they determine at most $O(n^{7/3})$ triangles of unit area.
By "determine", we mean that the triangle has vertices coming from the collection of points under consideration.
Proof. Let us fix a point $P$ from our collection, and try to understand how many unit area triangles are possible where $P$ is one of the vertices. Well, we first need to connect $P$ to another point $Q$ in the collection to get a side of the triangle. Consider the line $\overline{PQ}$ joining them. For a third point $R$ to be the remaining vertex of the triangle, it needs to be positioned anywhere on a particular line paralell to $\overline{PQ}$ with a prescribed distance away (and there are two possible parallel lines, one for each side of the line $\overline{PQ}$). In other words, the number of unit triangles where one of the vertices is $P$ can be counted by analyzing the number of incidences between the points in the collection (other than $P$, so there are $n-1$ points) and the 2 parallel lines joining $P$ to other points $Q$ (and again, there are at most $2(n-1)$ such lines). By corollary to Szemerédi-Trotter theorem, there are at most $O(n^{4/3})$ such incidences, which gives an upper bound for the number of unit area triangles where $P$ is one of the vertices. But now we must vary over $P$ among all $n$ different points in the collection, giving us a total of at most $n\cdot O(n^{4/3}) = O(n^{7/3})$ many triangles of unit area all of whose vertices come from our collection.