I know that if $M$ is a smooth $n$-dimensional manifold with boundary, then $\partial M$ is a smooth $(n-1)$-dimensional manifold. So for $p\in\partial M$, we have $T_p\partial M\cong\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^n\cong T_pM$. But I'm confused as to what elements of $T_p\partial M$ "look like". I imagine it is something like taking a vector in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and setting its last entry to $0$. So for the half plane $\mathbb{H}^2$ and $p\in\partial\mathbb{H}^2$, would $T_p\partial\mathbb{H}^2\cong \mathbb{R}$?
2025-01-13 02:23:48.1736735028
Tangent vectors in $T_p\partial M$
93 Views Asked by user153582 https://math.techqa.club/user/user153582/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- Find the interior product of a basic p-form $\alpha = dx_1 \wedge dx_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge dx_p$ and a vector field $X$
- Every Manifold is Locally Path Connected
- Connect Sum of a connected, compact manifold of dimension n and $S^n$
- homeomorphism of the closed disc on $\mathbb R ^2$
- Showing that the Mapping Torus is a topological manifold
- Suggestion for reference book for differential forms, differentiable manifolds and other topics
- Does every torus $T\subset S^3$ bounds a solid tours $S^1\times D^2\subset S^3$?
- Is the tangent bundle of hyperbolic space trivial?
- Is a smooth function still smooth in a sub-manifold containing its image?
- The Developing Map
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Tangent bundle equivalence not a pushforward
- Find the interior product of a basic p-form $\alpha = dx_1 \wedge dx_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge dx_p$ and a vector field $X$
- How do I make sense of terms $X^j\partial_j(Y^i)$ in the Lie bracket of vector fields?
- Is a smooth function still smooth in a sub-manifold containing its image?
- Sign of Riemannian and application of commutating formula .
- Is an integral manifold N of a distribution $\Delta$ over M always a submanifold of M?
- Infinite connected sum of S^n
- Characterization of Tangent Space as Quotient space of Vector Fields
- Smooth diffeomorphism and $C^1$ diffeomorphism
- The Riemannian Distance function does not change if we use $C^1$ paths?
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS-WITH-BOUNDARY
- Euler Characteristic of a boundary of a Manifold
- property of sum of coefs of a chain
- Universal cover of boundary
- Topological Boundary vs Manifold Boundary
- Computing parametrizations for a differentiable $2$-manifold with boundary
- Tangent vectors in $T_p\partial M$
- The nature of components in a certain manifold
- Topological Manifold is Manifold with Empty Boundary
- The corner of the squre
- In finding boundary of the product of two half-lines, shall homeomorphism be global?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Assuming $p\in \partial M$, $T_p \partial M$ should be understood as the subspace of $T_p M$ of vectors which point in a direction which is tangent to $\partial M$. There are several different ways to understand what this means, precisely.
One way is to recall that every tangent vector in $T_p M$ is the velocity vector at $p$ of some smooth curve in $M$. Then $T_p \partial M$ is the subspace of $T_p M$ which consists of velocity vectors at $p$ of smooth curves which lie entirely in $\partial M$. This is a great, geometrically intuitive way to think about it.
Another solution is to take a coordinate chart centered at $p$. Let $U \subset M$ be the coordinate neighborhood and let $\phi: U \to \Bbb{H}^n$ be the coordinate map. Then $\phi$ is a diffeomorphism of $U$ onto a neighborhood of $\Bbb{H}^n$, and therefore provides us with linear isomorphisms $T_p M \simeq T_0 \Bbb{H}^n$ and $T_p \partial M \simeq T_0 \partial \Bbb{H}^n$. Thus the problem is reduced to the case in which $M = \Bbb{H}^n$. In this case $T_0 \Bbb{H}^n$ is the vector space spanned by $\{\partial/\partial x_1, \ldots, \partial /\partial x_n\}$ (all evaluating at $0$, and the $\partial /\partial x_n$ is thought of as a one-sided derivative). Then $T_0 \partial \Bbb{H}^n$ is the subspace spanned by $\{\partial /\partial x_1, \ldots, \partial/\partial x_{n-1}\}$.
To see why any of the above is correct, you need to consider something much more general: An immersion $\psi : M \to N$ (e.g. an embedding or an inclusion of a submanifold) induces an injective linear map $d \psi_p: T_p M \to T_{\psi(p)} N$. We often identify $T_p M$ with its image under $d \psi_p$. The above is just the special case of this where $\psi$ is the inclusion $\partial M \hookrightarrow M$.