I want to show that in the finite partition of a random graph there is a random graph. I am not really sure how to do this. I think I need to show that a subset of a random graph satisfies the theory of a random graph, but I am very confused as to how to proceed.
2026-04-14 07:45:58.1776152758
The finite partition of a random graph has an element that is a random graph
57 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODEL-THEORY
- What is the definition of 'constructible group'?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Existence of indiscernible set in model equivalent to another indiscernible set
- A ring embeds in a field iff every finitely generated sub-ring does it
- Graph with a vertex of infinite degree elementary equiv. with a graph with vertices of arbitrarily large finite degree
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
- Sufficient condition for isomorphism of $L$-structures when $L$ is relational
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I guess the "random graph" you're referring to is the countably infinite random graph aka the Rado graph, which is characterized up to isomorphism as a (simple undirected) countable graph $G=(V,E)$ with the property that, for any disjoint finite sets $X,Y\subseteq V$, there is a vertex $v\in V\setminus(X\cup Y)$ which is joined to every vertex in $X$ and to no vertex in $Y$. (This condition will be satisfied with probability one if we take a countably infinite set of vertices and for each pair of vertices let an independent fair coin toss decide whether to join them with an edge.)
I guess the partition theorem you want to prove is the following: If $G=(V,E)$ is the Rado graph, and if $\{V_1,\dots,V_n\}$ is any partition of the vertex set $V$ into finitely many parts, and if $G_i=G[V_i]$ is the induced subgraph of $G$ on the vertex set $V_i$, then we have $G_i\cong G$ for some $i$.
Assume for a contradiction that no $G_i$ is isomorphic to $G$. Then for each $i$ there are disjoint finite sets $X_i,Y_i\subseteq V_i$ such that there is no vertex in $V_i\setminus(X_i\cup Y_i)$ which is joined to every vertex in $X_i$ and to no vertex in $Y_i$.
Since $X=X_1\cup\cdots\cup X_n$ and $Y=Y_1\cup\cdots\cup Y_n$ are disjoint finite subsets of $V$, there is a vertex $v\in V\setminus(X\cup Y)$ which is joined to every vertex in $X$ and to no vertex in $Y$. Then $v\in V_i\setminus(X_i\cup Y_i)$ for some $i$, and $v$ is joined to every vertex in $X_i$ and to no vertex in $Y_i$, contradicting our assumption.