I am studying calculus of variation, and I need to prove that
$I[w] = \int_U \frac{1}{2} |Dw|^2 - fw \, dx$ with $f \in L^2(U)$
is weakly lower semicontinuous on $H_0^1(U)$.
In classes, I only learned that
Assume L is bounded below, and in addition $L(p,z,x)$ is convex in $p$, for each $z \in \mathbb{R}$, $x \in U$. Then $I[.]$ is weakly lower semicontinuous on $W^{1,q}(U)$, where $I[w] = \int_U L(Dw, w, x)$.
And I think my $L$ isn't bounded below.
I don't know how I can solve the problem.
It can be proved from basic principles that $$\text{(norm lower semicontinuity)} + \text{(convexity)} \implies \text{(weak lower semicontinuity)}$$ Indeed,
For any topological space $X$ the lower semicontinuity of a function $f:X\to\mathbb{R}$ is equivalent to the epigraph $\{(x,z):z\ge f(x)\}\subset X\times \mathbb{R}$ being closed in the product topology.
In a normed space, a convex closed subset is weakly closed.
The above applies to $I$, which is convex and continuous with respect to the norm on $H_0^1$. Indeed, $$ |I[v]-I[w]|\le \frac12\int_U (|Dv+Dw|\,|Dv-Dw| + |f||v-w|) \\ \le \frac12(\|v\|_{H^1}+\|w\|_{H^1}) \|v-w\|_{H^1} + \frac12 \|f\|_{L^2}\|v-w\|_{L^2} $$
For completeness, I also quote the comment by Chee Han which shows the boundedness of $I$ from below (this does not help with lower semicontinuity, but is needed for the existence of minimizer).