When we are talking about Laurent series at a particular point usually we mean at the singular point right? But I have met one asking to compute the coefficient of the $ (z-2)^{-1} $ term in the Laurent series for $ f(z)=\frac{1}{z-5} $ centered at $ z=2 $ from the Cracking the GRE Mathematics Subject Text(Page 320, 4th. edition.).
The solution says:
To find the Laurent series of $ f(z) $, first manipulate the function: $$ f(z)=\frac{1}{z-5}=\frac{1}{z-2-3}=\frac{\frac{1}{z-2}}{1-\frac{3}{z-2}}=\frac{1}{z-2}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{3}{z-2}\right)^{n} ,$$ which is simply the sum of an infinite geometric series. The coefficient of the $ (z-2)^{-1} $ term corresponds to the $ n=0 $ term of the Laurent series, so the coefficient is $ 1 $.
What I do is: $$ f(z)=\frac{1}{z-5}=\frac{1}{z-2-3}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{3}(z-2)-1}=-\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{3}(z-2)}=-\frac{1}{3}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\left[\frac{1}{3}(z-2)\right]^{n} ,$$ so the coefficient of the $ (z-2)^{-1} $ is $ 0 $.
I am confused about the different outcomes. Can someone tell me the reason? Thanks~
Both computations are correct. Since $f$ is holomorphic in a neighborhood of $2$, the Laurent series at $2$ is a power series, so your representation is the Laurent series in question.
$f(z)=\frac{1}{z-2}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{3}{z-2}\right)^{n} $ is not the Laurent series centered at $2$.