Let q and t be positive integers with $q\geq t$. Determine the Ramsey number $r_t(t,t,q)$. This is from the book Introductory Combinatorics by Brualdi, and in the back it says the answer is q without any explanation. I found that odd since r(3,3,3)=17, what am I missing or is there a typo somewhere?
2026-03-28 08:50:18.1774687818
The Ramsey number $r(t,t,q)$ with $q\geq t$
769 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMBINATORICS
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Hard combinatorial identity: $\sum_{l=0}^p(-1)^l\binom{2l}{l}\binom{k}{p-l}\binom{2k+2l-2p}{k+l-p}^{-1}=4^p\binom{k-1}{p}\binom{2k}{k}^{-1}$
- Algebraic step including finite sum and binomial coefficient
- nth letter of lexicographically ordered substrings
- Count of possible money splits
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- A certain partition of 28
- Counting argument proof or inductive proof of $F_1 {n \choose1}+...+F_n {n \choose n} = F_{2n}$ where $F_i$ are Fibonacci
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in RAMSEY-THEORY
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Probability that in fully connected graph there is a clique of different colors
- Ramsey Number Upper Bound
- Ramsey Numbers with 3 Variables
- Van der Waerden type theorem
- Colouring of a grid $\mathbb{Z}^2$.
- Has this Ramsey-type function been studied?
- 2-coloring of R(m,m) with no monochromatic $K_m$
- Ramsey's Theorem(Numerical Example)
- Tic-tac-toe game on the cube 3×3×3
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The expressions $r_t(t,t,q)$ and $r(t,t,q)$ have different meanings. In the latter, you are coloring edges of a graph (that is, two-sized sets). In the former, you are coloring $t$-sized sets.
The number $r_t(t,t,q)$ is the smallest number $n$ that ensures that if we color the $t$-sized subsets of $n$ with $3$ colors $1,2,3$, we either have a monochromatic set of size $t$ in color $1$ or in color $2$, or else we have a monochromatic set of size $q$ in color $3$.
To show that this is $q$, suppose first we color the $t$-sized subsets of a set of size $q$ with $3$ colors $1,2,3$. If any $t$-sized set has color $1$ or $2$, we are done: That is our monochromatic set. The alternative is that all $t$-sized sets have color $3$. Then we have a monochromatic set of size $q$ for color $3$. This shows that $r_t(t,t,q)\le q$. To show the equality, simply color each $t$-sized subset of a set of size $q-1$ in color $3$. You don't have monochromatic sets in the first two colors, and no monochromatic set for the third color has size $t$, so $r(t,t,q)\ge q$.
In contrast, to compute $r(t,t,q)$ you must color sets of size $2$. If $t>2$, you are not automatically guaranteed a monochromatic set of size $t$ for color $1$ or $2$ simply because either color is used at least once. For example, if you color each edge of a triangle a different color, you have monochromatic sets of size $2$, but no monochromatic set of size $3$, so $r(3,3,3)>3=r_3(3,3,3)$.
The issue is simply that $\binom{t}{t}=1$ while $\binom{t}2>1$ for $t>1$. Recall that $\binom{a}{t}$ counts the number of $t$-sized subsets of a set of size $a$. When looking at $r_t(a,\dots)$, all these sets would have to have the same color to ensure a monochromatic set of size $a$ in the first color.