I am digging through a paper Theorems for free and a bit confused on the source of some conjectures (page 5):
Is it an axiom or it can be implied from some other axioms?
UPD
Question is about Cartesian product definition for relations. Is it an axiom or it can be derived from relation/Cartesian production definition?
UPD2
To expand on my source of confusion.
I have tried to derive this definition, but it differs from the one given in the paper. $\newcommand{\mc}{\mathcal}$
Then we have from the paper definitions for $\mc A$ and $\mc B$: $$\mc A: A \iff A'$$ $$\mc B: B \iff B'$$
from Cartesian product definition
$$(X, Y) \in \mc A \times \mc B$$
$X$ and $Y$ are values from corresponding relations $\mc A$ and $\mc B$ and it is possible to expand these values:
$$X \in \mc A, X = (x, x'), \ x \in A,\ x' \in A'$$ $$Y \in \mc B, Y = (y, y'), \ y \in B,\ y' \in B'$$
and then it appears:
$$((x, x'), (y, y')) \in \mc A \times \mc B$$
Tuple type is different from the paper one.
$$((A, A'), (B, B'))\ my\ type$$ $$((A, B), (A', B'))\ paper\ type$$
What is wrong?

It is a definition. The statement about a product of functions follows from the definition, since if $a,b$ are functions then $((x, y), (x', y')) \in a \times b$ iff $(x, x')\in a, (y, y')\in b$ iff $x' = ax, y' = ay$. Therefore $a\times b$ is a function, as every $(x,y)$ has a unique $(x', y')$ (this is $(ax, ay)$) such that $((x, y), (x', y'))\in a\times b$, and by definition $(a\times b)(x, y) = (ax, ay)$.