If a problem has worst-case lower bound Ω(n^2) and there is an algorithm with W(n) ∈ O(n), What can we say about the possibility, importance and order of optimality about this problem and algorithm?
2026-04-08 02:25:50.1775615150
Time complexity and optimality
182 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'll consider decision problems only, for optimisation problems the question could be quantified in plenty of ways.
I assume that you are asking the following: if a language $L \not\in \mathrm{DTime}(n^2)$ and another language $L' \in \mathrm{DTime}(n)$, how close in some sense $L'$ could be to $L$?
One of the more or less natural measures of closeness is the following one. For each $n \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mathbf{P}(L(x) = L'(x)) > 0$ where $x$ is uniformly distributed among $\{0,1\}^n$. Surprisingly, there exists a language $L \in \mathrm{DTime}(n^2)$ such that for any $L' \in \mathrm{DTime}(n)$ there exists infinitely many values of $n$ such that $\mathbf{P}(L(x) = L'(x)) = 0$. One can prove that using diagonalisation in a very similar way to time hierarchy Theorem:
An algorithm $B$ for the language $L$ will act as follows. $B(x)$ will run the algorithm corresponding to the string $|x|$ in binary form for $|x|^{1.5}$ steps (this takes $O(|x|^{1.5} \log |x|)$ time) and answers $0$ if $\langle|x|\rangle$ (the algorithm) did not halted and $1-\langle|x|\rangle(x)$ otherwise. For each algorithm in $\mathrm{DTime}(n)$ there are infinitely many equivalent algorithms and therefore the length of the encoding string of one of them is such that $|x|^{1.5} > cn$ where $c$ is a constant such that $\langle|x|\rangle$ does at most $cn$ steps. Thus $B$ will run $\langle|x|\rangle$ for sufficient number of steps and return the opposite value for any $y \in \{0,1\}^{|x|}$.