In contrast to the usual Atiyah definition of a topological quantum field theory as a monoidal functor between the category of n-dimensional Cobordisms and the category of vector spaces, in some places (e.g. at https://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.3010.pdf or in Wikipedia) I read definitions that also demand it to respect the rigid structure on those categories, i.e. orientation reversal on manifolds and the construction of the dual space. Is this actually an additional requirement, or does it already follow from the usual axioms, at least it seems to be true for 1- and 2-dimensional TQFTs? Thank you in advance for your answers.
2026-03-25 07:41:14.1774424474
TQFTs as rigid monoidal functors
113 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MONOIDAL-CATEGORIES
- Lax/colax monoidal adjunction in terms of unit and counit
- How to represent convolution matrix as a string diagram?
- Free monoidal category over a set II
- Are there "distributive bicategories"?
- Showing that naturality of this transformation follows from dinaturality of elements.
- Understanding The Equations Behind Dual Objects In Monoidal Categories
- Let $(C, \otimes, \alpha, 1, l, r)$ be a monoidal category. Show that $l_{1 \otimes A} = id_1 \otimes l_A$ and $r_{A \otimes 1} = r_A \otimes id_1$.
- Show that the unit object in a monoidal category is unique up to isomorphism.
- About the internal hom in a symmetric monoidal closed category
- Question concerning functors which are equivalences
Related Questions in TOPOLOGICAL-QUANTUM-FIELD-THEORY
- How are topological invariants obtained from TQFTs used in practice?
- What rigorous mathematical theorems has Edward Witten discovered?
- Question on Turaev's paper about axioms for topological quantum field theory
- Mathematical Physics references in the spirit of Segal's lectures
- What is $H_{3}Spin(3)$, and how is this related with the twist of framing on a 3-manifold?
- Field Theory Phase Factor vs Anomaly
- Is the category of $2$-topological quantum field theories locally small?
- Example of "practical" applications of Donaldson Invariants
- Temperley-Lieb Diagrams and Representations of U_q(sl_2)
- Examples of codim-2 objects in extended TQFT
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For two dimensional TQFTs a weaker (but very similar) property holds for free.
If $F$ is a 2-dimensional topological quantum field theory then it follows that every linear space in its essential image is finitely dimensional (the whole argument is a little bit long).
Observe that an object $S$ of the domain $2Cob$ of $F$ is a finite disjoint union of circumferences (as $S$ is a compact oriented 2-dimensional smooth manifold without boundary). Moreover one can prove that, if two objects $S,T$ of $2Cob$ are diffeomorphic through an orientation preserving diffeomorphism, then they are isomorphic in $2Cob$ and therefore (being $F$ a functor) it is the case that $FS\cong FT$ as linear spaces. In particular, as a circumference $C$ is always diffeomorphic to $C'$ ($C$ with the opposite orientation) through an orientation preserving diffeomorphism, it is the case that $FC\cong FC'$. Hence, if $S$ is an object of $2Cob$ and $S'$ is the manifold $S$ with the opposite orientation, then $FS\cong FS'$ (just use that $S$ is a finite disjoint union of circumferences).
Let's keep on considering an object $S$ of $2Cob$ and $S'$. Before I said that the essential image of $F$ is made of finitely dimensial vector spaces. Basically this follows because you can find two arrows $f \colon S \sqcup S' \to \emptyset$ and $g \colon \emptyset \to S'\sqcup S$ of $2Cob$ (that probably you know) such that:
$$(S \xrightarrow{1_S \sqcup g} S\sqcup S'\sqcup S \xrightarrow{f \sqcup 1_S} S)=(S\xrightarrow{1_S}S); $$
as $F$ is a monoidal functor, by this equality it follows that:
$$(FS \xrightarrow{1_{FS} \otimes Fg} FS\otimes FS'\otimes FS \xrightarrow{Ff \otimes 1_{FS}} FS)=(FS\xrightarrow{1_{FS}}FS). $$
As I said, this equality can be used to prove that $FS$ is finitely dimensional and hence conclude that linear spaces in the image of $F$ are finitely dimensional. However now we use it for another argument. In fact, you can check that this last equality implies that the linear map: \begin{aligned} FS' &\to (FS)^* \\ v &\mapsto ((Ff)(v\otimes-)\colon FS \to \mathbb{K}) \end{aligned} is injective and hence (being $FS$ and $FS'$ finitely dimensional and of the same dimension) an isomorphism (here I used that $Ff$ is a linear map $FS' \otimes FS \to \mathbb{K}$ and this follows from the monoidality of $F$).
Hence what we conclude is that there is a "very natural" isomorphism $FS'\cong (FS)^*$. Probably the equality between $(FS)^*$ and $FS'$ does not follow, but it seems reasonable to assume it, after having seen this fact.