This is the Gordon-Klein equation: $\frac{\partial^2 \psi }{\partial t^2} - c^2 (\frac{\partial^2 \psi }{\partial x^2} +\frac{\partial^2 \psi }{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \psi }{\partial z^2} ) +m^2c^4 \psi =0$ , where the reduced Planck constant is left out for convenience. The Dirac equation is the result of factorising the Gordon-Klein equation into a system of first order PDEs. But I feel that something has been left out of the original Gordon-Klein equation by this factorisation. I wonder if there is an alternative way of expressing the Gordon-Klein equation into another system of first order PDEs which corresponds exactly to the original Gordon-Klein equation.
2026-03-27 00:06:42.1774570002
Transform the Gordon-Klein equation to a system of first order PDEs but not using Dirac's approach
190 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-PDE
- Solving the heat equation with robin boundary conditions
- The energy method for $u_{tt}-du_t-u_{xx}=0, (0,1)\times(0,T) $
- Motivation to define the boundary value
- 1-D Heat Equation, bounding difference in $\alpha$ given surface temperature
- Comparison principle for linear second order viscosity solutions
- Implications of weak convergence on the Lebesgue space to Sobolev space
- Geometric meaning of this PDE :$\left\{\begin{array}{lll} f_{t}+xf_{y}=0\\ f|_{t=0}=f_{0}(x,y) \end{array}\right.$
- Simple linear first order PDE
- how to solve a linear pde of changing evolution equation?
- How to solve a PDE with time dependent domain?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Set $c=1$. I'll do the real-$\psi$ case; complex $\psi$ is similar.
The Klein-Gordon equation follows from the Lagrangian density$$\mathcal{L}=(\dot{\psi}^2-(\nabla\psi)^2-m^2\psi^2)/2.$$Physicists usually note this has momentum $\pi=\dot{\psi}$, so the Hamiltonian density is$$\mathcal{H}=\dot{\psi}\pi-\mathcal{L}=(\pi^2+(\nabla\psi)^2+m^2\psi^2)/2.$$Hamilton's equations are then$$\dot{\psi}=\pi,\,\dot{\pi}=\nabla^2\psi-m^2\psi.$$We can remove $\nabla^2$ by defining an alternative Hamiltonian density in terms of polymomenta$$\pi^\mu:=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\partial_\mu\psi}=\partial^\mu\psi$$viz.$$\mathcal{H}=\partial_\mu\psi\cdot\pi^\mu-\mathcal{L}=\frac12\left(\pi_\mu\pi^\mu+m^2\psi^2\right)$$(in $+---$), giving first-order equations$$\partial^\mu\psi=\pi^\mu,\,\partial_\mu\pi^\mu=-m^2\psi.$$