The Poisson bracket can be given via a bi-vector. Is there a tri-vector for the Nambu 3-bracket? and higher?
2026-03-25 04:35:05.1774413305
Tri-vector for Nambu bracket
92 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GAUGE-THEORY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- Holonomy group is closed or not?
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Connections on Bundles with Trivial Determinant
- Dimension of the space of harmonic $\mathrm{Ad}P$-valued differential 1-forms on a surface
- Vector-valued forms inside the first jet bundle
- Is the determinant of the holonomy gauge invariant / significant?
Related Questions in POISSON-GEOMETRY
- How to show that $t \subset g$ is a Lie sub-bialgebra if and only if $t^{\perp} \subset g^*$ is an ideal?
- Poisson bracket and curl - Second equation of MHD
- An analogue of the Poisson bracket in contact geometry?
- poisson and hamiltonian vector fields
- q-quantization of Lie bialgebras
- How exactly do I compute Poisson-Lie brackets?
- proof of the Jacobi Identity for certain poisson brackets
- Proving Jacobi identity for Poisson bracket using antisymmetric matrix
- Casimir Functions of Poisson Structure
- Intuition about Poisson bracket
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I assume we are talking about finite-dimensional smooth manifolds and using the Wikipedia definition of Nambu bracket.
A Nambu bracket is (in particular) a skew-symmetric multilinear multi-derivation $C^\infty(M) \times \cdots\times C^\infty(M) \to C^\infty(M)$.
Proof. Basically, if it is a derivation in the last argument, then skewness implies that it is a derivation in the other arguments as well. To be precise, let $h_1,\ldots,h_n \in C^\infty(M)$ and suppose that $h_k = f_kg_k$ is a product. Choose $\sigma \in S_n$ such that $\sigma(n) = k$ and $\sigma(k) = n$ (e.g. a transposition or the identity). Then:
$$\begin{align*}\{h_1,\ldots,h_k,\ldots,h_n\} &= (-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma)}\{h_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,h_{\sigma(k)},\ldots,h_{\sigma(n)}\} \\ &= (-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma)}\{h_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,h_n,\ldots,f_kg_k\} \\ &= (-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma)}(\{h_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,h_n,\ldots,f_k\}g_k + f_k\{h_{\sigma(1)},\ldots,h_n,\ldots,g_k\}) \\ &= (-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma)}((-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma^{-1})}\{h_1,\ldots,f_k,\ldots,h_n\}g_k+ (-1)^{\epsilon(\sigma^{-1})}f_k\{h_1,\ldots,g_k,\ldots,h_n\}) \\ &= \{h_1,\ldots,f_k,\ldots,h_n\}g_k+f_k\{h_1,\ldots,g_k,\ldots,h_n\}\end{align*}$$
In the penultimate line we applied $\sigma^{-1}$ to the arguments of each Nambu bracket (at the price of a sign that will cancel against the one we had so far): the argument in the $k$th position is moved to the $n$th position and vice-versa.
In fact all skew-symmetric multilinear multi-derivations $C^\infty(M) \times \cdots\times C^\infty(M) \to C^\infty(M)$ arise from multi-vector fields on $M$ (there is a one-to-one correspondence). This is basically a consequence of Taylor's theorem; see e.g. [Poisson geometry Lectures 1, 2, 3, Proposition 1.10].
In coordinates e.g. a $3$-bracket $\{f,g,h\}$ can be given via a 3-vector field $\sum_{i<j<k}\{x^i,x^j,x^k\}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\wedge\frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}\wedge\frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}$.