What is wrong in the following reasoning:
Every symmetric and transitive relation is a relation of equivalence
Proof:
$x \sim y \Rightarrow y\sim x$ - becuase of symmetry
$x \sim y \wedge y\sim x \Rightarrow x\sim x$ - because of transitivity
Therefore the relation is reflexive - so it is a relation of equivalence
This argument assumes that $x$ is related to some $y$, which may not be the case.