What are some fundamental reasons that Complex analysis in $\mathbb{C}$ is more powerful, but it is not possible to generalize to the Real analysis in $\mathbb{R}$ or the Quaternion analysis in $\mathbb{H}$? What makes the $\mathbb{C}$ more special than the Real $\mathbb{R}$ or Quaternion $\mathbb{H}$?
What are some tricks that can be done in Complex analysis, but not possible in Real analysis or Quaternion analysis?
Here I provide additional details: for example in complex analysis, we have the Riemann zeta function. But there is no obvious counterpart in real analysis or in quaternion analysis.
One operation where complex analysis fits is tetration, which is defined for integer heights as $^2x=x^x$, $^3x=x^{x^x}$, etc. If we try to interpolate to define the operation for fractional "power-tower" heights, there are many ways to do it. But in complex analysis a unique interpolation with a single branch cut in the complex plane is defined:
Cited references
1. Paulsen, W.; Cowgill, S. (March 2017). "Solving ${\displaystyle F(z+1)=b^{F(z)}}$ in the complex plane" (PDF). Advances in Computational Mathematics 43: 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10444-017-9524-1. S2CID 9402035.
2. Kouznetsov, D. (July 2009). "Solution of ${\displaystyle F(z+1)=\exp(F(z))}$ in complex $z$-plane" (PDF). Mathematics of Computation 78 (267): 1647–1670. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-09-02188-7.
3. Kneser, H. (1950). "Reelle analytische Lösungen der Gleichung ${\displaystyle \varphi {\Big (}\varphi (x){\Big )}={\rm {e}}^{x}}$ und verwandter Funktionalgleichungen". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (in German). 187: 56–67.
4. Paulsen, W. (June 2018). "Tetration for complex bases". Advances in Computational Mathematics. 45: 243–267. doi:10.1007/s10444-018-9615-7. S2CID 67866004.