I am wondering if there are some tricks to solve inequalities which are not manageable analytically. For example consider the inequality (say we restrict on positive $x$):
$\displaystyle \frac {\text e^{-x^2}}{x^2}<1 $
Let's say I want to find a good lower bound for $x$ which solves this inequality.
But I can not solve it analytically to end up with a statement like: For all $x>...$ the inequality is fulfilled.
Unfortunately I just know the two usual tricks like
- estimate $\frac {\text e^{-x^2}}{x^2}$ against some other function which is manageable. For example I know that $\frac {\text e^{-x^2}}{x^2}<1/x^2$ and $1/x^2<1$ for all $x>1$. So $x>1$ gives me a lower bound for $x$.
- try some value and use the fact that $\frac {\text e^{-x^2}}{x^2}$ is strictly decreasing. So I find that $x=0.8$ solves the inequality which gives me the slightly improved bound: $x>0.8$
Are there some more tricks? Some general treatments how to deal with inequalities where I have a precise expression of $x$ but can not solve it for $x>...$ analytically?
In some cases, tables of function values work just fine. For example, the cumulative distribution function for Gaussian law has no analytical expression, yet its quantiles are important, so people just calculated its values with a sufficient precision ("sufficient" varies form task to task).
In other cases, CAS software can be useful.If you're trying to look at the behaviour of some function (take your problem, for instance), you can easily build a plot in, say, Mathematica, and even get a solution to your problem with a sufficient precision (yet it won't give the exact bound, of course).