I was told that
Two permutation matrices represent conjugate permutations iff they have same characteristic polynomial (where the conjugacy is considered only in $S_{n}$).
The first implication is clear to me i.e. permutation matrices representing conjugate permutations, being similar matrices, have same characteristic polynomial. But, I do not understand why is it necessary that if two permutation matrices have same characteristic polynomial they should represent conjugate permutation? I was told to see newton's identities. But I do not see anything relating characteristic polynomial with permutation matrices in them.
Anyhow, I did it and I have written answer. But, I would really like to know a whether there exists a proof that uses newtons identities or algaebraic manipulations.
If a matrix $A$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n$ (listed with algebraic multiplicity), then $A^k$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1^k,\dots,\lambda_n^k$, and so $\operatorname{tr}(A^k)=\sum_i\lambda_i^k.$ By Newton's identities, $\sum_i\lambda_i^k$ can be expressed in terms of the elementary symmetric polynomials in the $\lambda_i$, which are just (up to sign) the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of $A$.
The upshot is that if $A$ and $B$ have the same characteristic polynomial, then $\operatorname{tr}(A^k)=\operatorname{tr}(B^k)$ for all $k$. Now if $A$ is a permutation matrix corresponding to a permutation $\pi$, then $\operatorname{tr}(A^k)$ is just the number of fixed points of $\pi^k$. So, it suffices to show that if $\pi,\rho\in S_n$ are such that $\pi^k$ and $\rho^k$ have the same number of fixed points for each $k$, then $\pi$ and $\rho$ have the same cycle structure. To show this, let $a_k$ be the number of $k$-cycles in $\pi$ and let $b_k$ be the number of $k$-cycles in $\rho$. Note then that the number of fixed points of $\pi^k$ is $\sum_{d\mid k}da_d$ and the number of fixed points of $\rho^k$ is $\sum_{d\mid k}db_d$. We know these are equal, and using strong induction on $k$ we may assume that $a_d=b_d$ for every proper divisor $d$ of $k$. It follows that $ka_k=kb_k$ and thus $a_k=b_k$.