In the proof of theorem 5.2 of Spivak's calculus on manifolds, he invokes the inverse function theorem for a function g that he defines there without ever assuming that it was continuously differentiable. Is this a typo?
2026-04-02 22:58:32.1775170712
Typo in Spivak Calculus on Manifolds?
345 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
The function $g$ is defined as $$g(a,b)=f(a)+(0,b)$$ with $f$...