Unable to prove that a statement is an equivalent form of the Axiom of Choice

190 Views Asked by At

The exercise 22 page 158 of Elements of Set Theory by B. Enderton is the following:

Show that the following statement is another equivalent version of the axiom of choice: For any set $A$ there is a function $F$ with $\text{dom }F=\bigcup A$ and such that $x\in F(x)\in A$ for all $x\in\bigcup A$.

The versions of the axiom of choice that I know for the moment are:

enter image description here

(although the Cardinal comparability and Zorn's lemma were stated as well, the author didn't prove yet that they're equivalent to the Axiom of Choice)

and the following form: (Exercise 18 in the same page)

enter image description here

I proved that AC III implies the statement of the exercise as follows:

Let $A$ be a set According to AC III there exists a function $f:\mathcal{P}A\setminus\{\emptyset\}\to A$ such as $\forall X\in\mathcal{P}A\setminus\{\emptyset\},\,f(X)\in X$.

Let

\begin{align*} g:&\bigcup A\,\,\to \mathcal{P}A\setminus\{\emptyset\}\\ &x \quad\quad\mapsto\{a\in A\mid x\in a\} \end{align*}

$g$ is a well defined function/

Let $F=f\circ g$. Then $\text{dom }F=\text{dom }g=\bigcup A$.

Let $x\in\bigcup A$. $F(x)=f(g(x))=f\left(\{a\in A\mid x\in a\}\right)$. Thus $F(x)\in\{a\in A\mid x\in a\}$. Thus $x\in F(x)\in A$.$$\tag*{$\square$}$$

I couldn't prove the other way. I had two ideas:( $F:\bigcup A\to A$ such that $\forall a\in\bigcup A,\,a\in F(a)\in A$)

1) We could try to construct an "inverse" of $F$. But $F$ isn't necessarily injective nor surjective. Thus such a construction would require the axiom of choice.

2) We could consider $f=F\circ g$ where $g:\,A\to \bigcup\bigcup A$ and $F:\,\bigcup\bigcup A\to\bigcup A$ but I couldn't find a suitable $g$.

Could you please help me? Thanks you in advance!