The following is part of the inductive step in Wiki's proof for Helly's theorem. Why is it true?
In this new collection, every subcollection of d + 1 sets will have nonempty intersection
The following is part of the inductive step in Wiki's proof for Helly's theorem. Why is it true?
In this new collection, every subcollection of d + 1 sets will have nonempty intersection
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
The whole inductive step in the proof is
First we have
The argument referred to is the one given for the base case. It does not rely on the induction hypothesis. Now, we form a collection of $n-1$ sets consisting of $X_1$ through $X_{n-2}$ and $X_{n-1}\cap X_n$. If you choose $d+1$ elements from this collection and take their intersection, there are two possibilities:
In either case, the intersection of $d+1$ elements is not empty.