Let $f:[0,\infty) \to \mathbb R$ be a continuous function such that $f(x) \to 0$ as $x \to \infty$. If $\epsilon >0$ then there exists a polynomial $p$ such that $|f(x)-e^{-x}p(x)|<\epsilon$ for all $x \in [0,\infty)$. This is an exercise by Serge Lang. I will post an answer after 24 hours to see if there is a solution better than mine. My proof is fairly elementary but somewhat long and I have been shown a shorter proof using a couple of non-trivial theorems.
2026-03-25 06:09:16.1774418956
Uniform approximation on $[0,\infty)$
202 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in APPROXIMATION-THEORY
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Clarification for definition of admissible: $\Delta\in (K)$
- Best approximation of a function out of a closed subset
- Approximation for the following integral needed
- approximate bijective function such that the inverses are bijective and "easily" computable
- Approximating $\frac{\frac{N}{2}!\frac{N}{2}!}{(\frac{N}{2}-m)!(\frac{N}{2}+m)!}$ without using logs
- Prove that a set is not strictly convex
- Uniform approximation of second derivative via Bernstein polynomial
- Show that there exists 2 different best approximations
- Zolotarev number and commuting matrices
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $g(x)=f(-\ln x)$ if $0 < x \leq 1$, $g(0)=0$. Then $g \in C[0,1]$. Let $\epsilon>0$ By Wierstrass Theorem there existse a polynomial $q_1$ such that $|g(x)-q_1(x)| <\epsilon$ for $0 \leq x \leq 1$. Let $q_1 (x)=\sum_{j=0}^{N} a_jx^{j}$ Note that $|a_0|=|g(0)-q_1 (0)|< \epsilon$. If $q(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{N} a_jx^{j}$ then $|g(x)-q(x)|<2\epsilon$ for all $x \in [0,1]$. Going back to $[0,\infty)$ we get $|f(x)-\sum_{j=1}^{N} a_je^{-jx}|<2\epsilon$ for all $x \geq 0$. From this we conclude that it is enough to prove the result for the special functions $e^{-kx}$ where $k$ is a positive integer. We do this by induction on $k$. For $k=1$ we take $p \equiv 1$. Not assume that $|e^{-kx}-e^{-x}p_k(x)| <\epsilon$ for $ x \geq 0$. Changing $x$ to $a_k x$ where $a_k=1+\frac 1 k$ we get $$|e^{-(k+1)x}-e^{-a_k x}r_k(x)|<\epsilon$$ where $r_k x=p_k (a_k x)$. If we show that there is a polynomial $\phi$ such that $$|e^{-x}\phi(x)r_k(x)-e^{-a_kx}r_k(x)|<\epsilon$$ for all $x\geq 0$ the proof would be complete. We claim that $\phi(x)=\sum_{m=0}^{2N} \frac {(-x/k)^{m}} {m!}$ will suffice provided we choose $N$ sufficiently large. We use an elementary fact about alternating series: if $s_n$ is the n-th partial sum of the series $\sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac {(-x)^{m}} {m!}$ then $s_{2n-1} \leq e^{-x} \leq s_{2n}$ which implies $|e^{-x}-s_{2N}| \leq \{s_{2N}-{s_{2N-1}}\} =\frac {(-x)^{2N}} {2N!}$. Hence $$|e^{-x}\phi(x)r_k(x)-e^{-a_kx}r_k(x)| \leq M e^{-x/k} \frac {(-x/k)^{2N}} {2N!}$$ where $M=\sup \{e^{-(1-\frac 1 k)x}r_k(x):x \geq 0\}$. The last expression attains its maximum on $[0,\infty)$ at $x=2kN$. It remains only to see that this maximum value, namely, $\frac {Me^{-2N} (2N)^{2N}} {(2N)!} \to 0 $ as $N \to \infty$. This is an immediate consequence of Stirling's Formula.