how to prove that binary number is always represent unique decimal number? (uniqueness of binary system) i.e every binary number determines unique decimal number i.e there is one-to-one relationship between binary and decimal.
2026-03-27 16:46:24.1774629984
Uniqueness of binary representation
4.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMBER-SYSTEMS
- Why do we can't replace binary numbers with decimal like we do in hexadecimal and octal?
- How many numerals (unique glyphs) do we use to note a number in a non-integer base numeral system?
- How to convert from base 4 to base 16?
- Find possible bases of an operation
- What is the logic behind the octal to decimal conversion using the expansion method?
- Why the hexadecimal numbers can be converted directly into binary numbers so cleanly?
- Base 17 on a Suanpan (Chinese abacus)
- How to Prove Square Number?
- Multiplication of two number in 2's complement
- We know that $2^0$=1 but why $(-2)^0$=not 1
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To prove that binary numbers represent unique decimal numbers, simply prove that two unequal sequences of bits will always produce different decimal numbers. This can be done with inequalities.
Define two numbers $b \ne c$ and give their binary representations via:
$b = b_1b_2\cdots b_n$
$c = c_1c_2\cdots c_n$
Define $k$ such that $k$ is the least number such that $b_k \ne c_k$
Let $d = (b_1b_2\cdots b_{k-1}) \times 2^{n-k+2} = (c_1c_2\cdots c_{k-1}) \times 2^{n-k+2}$.
Then define $b' = b - d$, $c' = c - d$
WLOG, say $b_k = 1, c_k = 0$.
The number $c_{k+1}\cdots c_n$ is at most $2^{n-k+1}-1$, while the value $b_k = 2^{n-k+1}$.
This shows that $b' > c' \Rightarrow b' \ne c'$ for any difference in the sequence of bits. They will always yield unique decimal numbers.
Thus, $b \ne c$ since $b' + d \ne c' + d$.
The proof of decimal numbers yielding unique bit sequences uses the same logic.
EDIT: In light of Zheng's comment, this is good for a finite decimal expansion. If the decimal expansion is infinite, it can end up not being a one-to-one.