Use of Banach Algebra to define the fourier transform, is this generalizable?

109 Views Asked by At

In Rudin's real and complex analysis section 9.22 there's an interesting application, at least to me, of banach algebras techniques. I am not a mathematician so I might be misunderstanding what this section is.

Essentially because $L^1$ is a Banach Algebra w.r.t. the convolution as multiplication operator the following equation is well defined

$$ \varphi(f * g) = \varphi(f)\varphi(g) \;\;\;\; (1) $$

After some analysis at the end of the section yields the following theorem

9.23 Theorem To every complex homomorphism $\varphi$ in $L^1$, except to $\varphi = 0$ there corresponds a unique $t \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $\varphi(f) = \hat{f}(t)$.

If I may dumb this down what it sounds to me is that the Fourier transform is defined by the $(1)$ uniquely.

Here's a question, are there any other transforms that can be defined in a similar way? I know that the fourier transform is generalized by the Gelfand-Transform, but this is not a tool I am extremely familiar with, yet.