I'm having a bit of trouble with something most everyone might find trivial, and I feel rather silly asking, but here it goes. The premise is as follows:
"Use the Intermediate Value Theorem to prove that the number $\sqrt[3]{20}$ exists and has a value greater than 2 but less than 3."
As part of the solution to the problem, the author establishes that $f(x)=x^3, a=2, b=3, f(a)=f(2)=8$, and $f(b)=f(3)=27$
My question is: As you can see in the premise, the function itself, $f(x)=x^3$ (and $f(2)$ or $f(3)$ for that matter) was not given, was there enough information in the problem itself to allow me to figure that out and I just wasn't able to do so as the solution is implying, or was the premise incomplete or wrongly worded? I'm inclined to think the problem is on my end, since this is what I consider to be a great book and an author I highly respect.
Thank you for your attention.
I'm sorry to say that, but, yes, there was enough information given.
The symbol $\sqrt[3]{20}$ denotes by definition a number $w$ with the the property that $e^3=20$. Therefore, it is natural to find $e$ by looking for a solution of the equation $$x^3=20.$$ In the context of the Intermediate Value Theorem (as mentioned in the problem statement), it is quite evident, that we are supposed to view the left hand side of this equation as a function (that we easily recognize as being continuous, just as needed for the theorem), and the constant on right hand as the function value. Recalling the statement of the IVT, the obvious task then is to find real numbers $a,b$ with $f(a)<20<f(b)$. And we do not even have to look far for these as they are literally given in the prblem statement as $2$ and $3$.