In variable separable method we assume the solution to be the product of such functions each of which is function of only one variable. What is the basis for that assumption? What allows us to assume that the solution is in such a product form?
2026-03-26 07:37:37.1774510657
Variable separation method for solving wave equation
153 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in WAVE-EQUATION
- Can I obtain an analytical solution for the wave equation with a non-zero neumann BC?
- Solve $U_{tt}=a U_{xx}$ when a<0.
- General solution of the wave equation
- Finding the general solution of an equation.
- The energy method for $u_{tt}-du_t-u_{xx}=0, (0,1)\times(0,T) $
- Bounds on solutions of the wave equation
- Wave equation with Robin and Neumann boundary conditions
- Prove that $|\Phi(p)|^2 \propto\sin^2\left( \frac{p L}{\hbar}\right) $
- Wave Equation Intuition in the case of a horizontal string
- Multi-variable chain rule - confusion in application
Related Questions in ELECTROMAGNETISM
- Kirchhoff's Law and Highest Potential Node
- can I solve analytically or numerically the equation $\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{J}=0$ with the following boundaries?
- How to make the Biot-Savart law to go along a spiral shaped coil?
- I am currently reading Special Relativity by Woodhouse, I need help with understanding divergence of magnetic fields
- Calculation of capacitance between two cylinders
- Find directions where current is maximal
- What is the relation between 2d Fourier Transform and Plane Waves?
- Magnetic force term in Kobe's derivation of Maxwell's equations
- Expansion of 1/R
- Gauss' law and a half-cylinder
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Fourier developed separation of variables. He looked for solutions that had the form $$ X(x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n)= X_1(x_1)X_2(x_2)\cdots X_n(x_n) $$ where these are the variables of the equation (some variables could be time, and others would be spatial.) Then he would divide the resulting equation by $X$, and try to isolate on the left side of the equation all terms that depended on only one variable. He would then conclude that because the left side did not depend on any variables on the right and vice-versa, there would be a constant $\lambda$ such that $$ \mbox{LEFT HAND SIDE} = \lambda = \mbox{RIGHT HAND SIDE} $$ That's how he ended up with two equations; the one on the left would be an ODE in a single variable $x_k$, and the one on the right would be a PDE that would no longer depend on $x_k$. So the left side was an ODE in one variable. He would continue this process until the PDE was reduced to a system of ODES, which was possible for only a limited class of equations, but that class included many equations that were very important to Physics. After that, Fourier used "orthogonality" relations to be able to fully sole the ODEs using what we now call Fourier series and Fourier integral representations of functions.
There was no basis for the assumption. Fourier tried something, and he was able to make it work for some very important equations. It took a lot original ideas to make it work, and his Fourier series ideas were so controversial at the time that his original manuscript on The Analytical Theory of Heat where these techniques were developed was banned from publication for many years, until he would gain such prominence that he would force its publication in basically in its original form. Here's a free translation of Fourier's original work at Google; it's a legitimate free copy. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Analytical_Theory_of_Heat/No8IAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Fourier,+analytical+theory+of+heat+conduction&printsec=frontcover