Consider the problem $$ (*)\begin{cases} x''(t)= F(x(t)) \\x(0)=P, x(1)=Q \end{cases}$$ where $P,Q\in\mathbb{R}^3$, $x=(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ and $F=-\nabla U$ for some potential $U:\mathbb{R}^3\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$. With the assumption of $U$ is upper bounded, I want to show that $(*)$ admits weak solution. This could be done by minimizing the functional $$\phi (x)= \int_0^1 \frac{1}{2} \Vert x' \Vert ^2 - U(x)\ dt $$on $A=\lbrace x\in H^1(0,1)^3: x(0)=P, x(1)=Q\rbrace$, where $\Vert x'\Vert^2=x_1'^2+ x_2'^2+ x_3'^2 $. One classical result in minimizing functional is essentially: $\phi$ coercive and weakly lower semicontinuous $\Rightarrow$ $\phi$ attains its minimum. But I don't know how to prove this two conditions for $\phi$. Any help/hint would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
2026-03-27 14:39:46.1774622386
Variational method in classical mechanic's problem
81 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in CALCULUS-OF-VARIATIONS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Relationship between Training Neural Networks and Calculus of Variations
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation for a functional a single variable with higher derivatives.
- Does the covariant derivative commute with the variational derivative?
- Derivative of a functional w.r.t. a single point?
- calculus of variations with double integral textbook?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm going to assume that $U$ is continuous (which is not that obvious because the condition $-\nabla U = f$ could be in the sense of distributions). Let's start by making the boundary conditions homogeneous: Take $x_0$ a fixed function that satisfies $$x_0(0) = P, x_0(1) = Q$$ for instance $x_0(t) = P + (P - Q)t$ will do. Now we consider the problem in the new variable $y = x - x_0$ which is in $H^1_0(0,1)^3$ $$\phi(y) = \int_0^1 \frac12 \|y' - (P - Q)\|^2 - U(y - x_0)dt$$
For the lower semi-continuity: the first part $$\int_0^1 \frac12 \|y' - (P - Q)\|^2dt$$ is clearly continuous in the strong topology and convex, so it is lower semi continuous in the weak topology. For the second part $$\int_0^1 -U(y - x_0)dx$$ we can simply use Fatou's lemma. Let say that $U$ is bounded by $U_0$, hence $U_0 - U$ is positive. Lets take $(y_n)_{n\in \mathbb N}\subseteq H^1_0(0,1)^3$ that converges weakly to $y\in H^1_0(0,1)^3$. Then by compact embedding, $y_n$ converges strongly in $C^0([0,1])^3$ so
$$\liminf \int_0^1 U_0 - U(y_n - x_0) dt \geq \int_0^1 \liminf U_0 - U(y_n - x_0) dt = \int_0^1 U_0 - U(y - x_0) dt $$ which proves sequential lower semi-continuity(which is enough for existence of minimisers). (Here you actually can prove that $U(y_n - x_0$ also converge uniformly so you can use the usual riemman convergece theorem instead of Fatou, but either way, it is good to now this way of proving it because sometimes the only thing that you can proof is point-wise convergence (a.e.))
The coercivity is trivial from the inequality $$ \phi(y) \geq C\|y\|_{H_0^1}^2 + \|P - Q\|^2 - 2\|y\|_{H_0^1} \|P - Q\|- U_0$$ where we used the Poincare inequality.