I'm looking for the intuition behind this property, hopefully one that would be at a high-school level of reasoning. Looking through several of the answers here, I came onto this one, whose answers, to me, didn't provide the intuition. (Specifically for the case of multiplying each vector's components rather than the "trig definition"). If anyone could provide a simpler, intuitive answer that would be great.
Vector dot product = 0 for perpendicular vectors
2.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 5 best solutions below
On
For your specific question of why the dot product is 0 for perpendicular vectors, think of the dot product as the magnitude of one of the vectors times the magnitude of the part of the other vector that points in the same direction. So, the closer the two vectors' directions are, the bigger the dot product. When they are perpendicular, none of vector A is going in the direction of vector B.
In the image below, dot product is |B||A|cos$\theta$.
|A|cos$\theta$ can be thought of as the amount of A going in the direction of B.

On
It can be though as the component of one vector along the other, since they are perpendicular they have no mutual componenets, or in another sense they are very dissimiliar, belonging to entirely different dimensions, for vectors that are very similiar and are close dimensionally, the dot product is large.
In the image below, dot product is |B||A|cos$\theta$.
|A|cos$\theta$ can be thought of as the amount of A going in the direction of B.

On
Using $(a_1,b_1) \cdot (a_2,b_2) = a_1a_2 + b_1b_2$, having a dot product of zero means $$ \frac{b_1}{a_1} = - \frac{a_2}{b_2}, $$ so the "slope" of one vector is negative the reciprocal of the "slope" of the other, which means they are perpendicular.
On
Consider two vectors $A$ and $B$. By projecting on $A$, decompose $B$ in a parallel and a normal component.
As regards the modules (lengths),
the dot product is the product of $A$ and $B^\parallel$,
the cross product is the product of $A$ and $B^\perp$.

What can you conclude when $B^\parallel=0$ or $B^\perp=0$ ?
Let's stick to $\mathbb{R}^2$.
First notice that if one vector lies along the $x$ axis $u = x\hat{i}$ and the other $v = y\hat{j}$ lies along the $y$ axis, then their dot product is zero.
Next, take an arbitrary pair of vectors $u, v$ which are perpendicular. If we can rotate both of them so that they both lie along the axes and the dot product is invariant under that rotation, then we have the result.
That is, let $R$ be the linear transformation or matrix such that $Ru$ and $Rv$ lie along the axes. Then if it is the case that $$Ru \cdot Rv = u \cdot v \ \ \ - (\star)$$ then we're done, because $Ru \cdot Rv = 0$ and hence $u \cdot v = 0$.
Remember that $Ru \cdot Rv = 0$ by our first observation.
That's the intuition. Make sense?
Now it turns that intuition holds up because ($\star$) is true. What follows now is some algebra demonstrating ($\star$). It takes up more room than the idea, which is unfortunate as the idea is the more important thing.
A rotation $R$ can be written for some $\theta$ as
$$R = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta \ \sin\theta \\ -\sin\theta \ \cos\theta \end{pmatrix}$$
Writing $u$ and $v$ now as column vectors with $u = {u_x \choose u_y}$ and $v = {v_x \choose v_y}$, then
$$Ru = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta \ \sin\theta \\ -\sin\theta \ \cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} u_x \\ u_y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} u_x\cos\theta + u_y\sin\theta \\ -u_x\sin\theta + u_y\cos\theta \end{pmatrix}$$
Similarly,
$$Rv = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta \ \sin\theta \\ -\sin\theta \ \cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} v_x \\ v_y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} v_x\cos\theta + v_y\sin\theta \\ -v_x\sin\theta + v_y\cos\theta \end{pmatrix}$$
Hence
$$Ru \cdot Rv = \begin{pmatrix} u_x\cos\theta + u_y\sin\theta \\ -u_x\sin\theta + u_y\cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} v_x\cos\theta + v_y\sin\theta \\ -v_x\sin\theta + v_y\cos\theta \end{pmatrix}$$
$$ = ( u_x\cos\theta + u_y\sin\theta )(v_x\cos\theta + v_y\sin\theta) + (-u_x\sin\theta + u_y\cos\theta)(-v_x\sin\theta + v_y\cos\theta) $$
$$ = u_xv_x(\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta) + u_xv_y(\sin\theta\cos\theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta) + u_yv_x (\sin\theta\cos\theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta) + u_yv_y(\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta)$$
$$ = u_xv_x + u_yv_y$$
$$= u \cdot v$$
That is $Ru \cdot Rv = u \cdot v$, as desired.