I use the following facts:
The completeness axiom.
If supreme of a set an element the said set, then it is the maximum of the set.
Suppose S is finite non-empty set of real number. By the completeness axiom we are granted a supremum
exists for set. Call it is M. Assume as to acquire a contradiction that M is not in set S. Now take
any element s_1 in S. We must have s_1 < M, and hence there is s_2 in S such that s_1 < s_2
[note s_2 is not equal to M because of our assumption]
We may repeat the same argument over and over and generate infinitely many elements of S, which is
absurd because it is a finite set.
A similar argument should work for the case of a minimum.