Let $A$ be any set .Let $P(A)$ be the power set of $A$.Then which are correct?
- $P(A)=\emptyset $ for some $A$.
- $P(A)= $ is a finite set for some $A$.
- $P(A)= $ is a countable set for some $A$.
$P(A)=$ uncountable for some $A$.
- is false because $P(A)\neq \emptyset $ for any set at best it can be $\{\emptyset\}$.
2.true,Take $A=\{a,b\}$ then $P(A)$ is finite
3.True ,Take $A=\{a,b\}$ then $P(A)$ is finite and hence countable.
4.true take $A=\Bbb N$
But 3 is given as false.i am not getting it.Please help
The word "countable" is used in two different ways:
Sometimes it means "can be injected into $\mathbb{N}$". (This is what I'll mean by "countable" for the rest of this answer.) Under this definition, $\{a, b\}$ is countable.
Other times it means "can be bijected to $\mathbb{N}$". (That is, countable and infinite.) Under this definition, $\{a, b\}$ is not countable.
The former definition is in my experience by far the most common - however, many texts still use the latter. I suspect that your book is using the latter definition.
So what (c) is really asking is: "Is there a set whose powerset is countable and infinite?" The answer is indeed "no". For the proof, here's a hint: if $P(A)$ is countable and infinite, show that $A$ is countable and infinite; this yields a contradiction (do you see why?).
Technically, if you assume the Axiom of Choice, showing just "if $P(A)$ is countable and infinite then $A$ is infinite" is enough to get a contradiction; this implicitly uses the statement "every infinite set contains a countable infinite subset," which is not provable from ZF (= set theory without choice) alone. However, the argument using the hint I gave above doesn't use any choice.