Why does Veronese surface contain no lines? Can you give me a reference about this fact? Thank you for your answers.
2026-05-06 08:55:24.1778057724
Veronese surface contains no lines
445 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We reason by contradiction. Let $\phi : \mathbb{P}^2 \to \mathbb{P^5}$ be the Veronese embedding and $C'$ be the preimage of the given $C \cong \mathbb{P}^1$. Then $1 = C.O_{\mathbb{P}^5}(1) = \phi_*C'.O_{\mathbb{P}^5}(1) = C'.\phi^*O_{\mathbb{P}^5}(1) = C'.O_{\mathbb{P}^2}(2) = 2d$ where $d$ is the degree of $C'$ inside $\mathbb{P}^2$. This is a contradiction and therefore we are done.
Maybe I'll try to express the above solution in simple terms of Bezout theorem.
Assume the line $C \cong \mathbb{P}^1$ exists. Take a hyperplane $H$ in $\mathbb{P}^5$ which intersects $C$ in one point. Then, on one hand the preimage $\phi^{-1}(C \cap H)$ consists of a single point. On the other hand, it's an intersection $C' \cap \phi^{-1}H$ which is by Bezout theorem equal to $deg(C')deg(\phi^{-1}H)$ and $\phi^{-1}H$ is a quadric, i.e., a curve of degree $2$. Contradiction:>
You could probably look to Harris and Eisenbud "3264 and all that..".