For any $p\in(1,\infty)$ there holds the Littlewood-Paley inequality $$ \Vert f\Vert_{L^p}\sim_{n,p}\left\Vert \left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\left\vert \dot P_kf(x)\right\vert^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\right\Vert_{L^p}$$ with the Littlewood-Paley projections $\dot P_kf$ defined by $\widehat{\dot P_kf}=\psi_k\widehat{f}$, where $\mathrm{Supp}(\psi_k)\subset\{2^{k-1}\leq\vert\xi\vert \leq2^{k+1}\}$ and $\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\psi_k(x)=1$ for $x\neq 0$. If I alternatively define the projections $P_kf$ by $P_kf=\dot P_kf$ for $k\geq1$ and $\widehat{P_0f}=\phi\widehat{f}$ with a bump function $\phi$ with support around the origin and $\phi+\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\psi_k=1$. Does there also hold the similar inequality $$\Vert f\Vert_{L^p}\sim_{n,p}\left\Vert \left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}_0}\left\vert P_kf(x)\right\vert^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\right\Vert_{L^p}?$$
2026-05-10 14:06:51.1778422011
Version of Littlewood-Paley inequality
1.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in LITTLEWOOD-PALEY-THEORY
- $L^p$ norm of Littlewood-Paley block of a smooth function
- Littlewood-Paley decomposition with arbitrary dilation factor
- What is Littlewood–Paley theory?
- A Besov norm estimate of analytic function based on Paley-Wiener theorem
- Besov–Zygmund spaces and the Inverse Function Theorem, is the Inverse Zygmund?
- $L^p$-norm estimate of Littlewood-Paley multiplier operator
- A Littlewood-Paley estimate
- Couterexample to Littlewood-Paley theorem
- Search for a reference on characterising Lebesgue spaces in terms of (inhomogeneous) Besov spaces.
- How to prove the Littlewood-Paley characterization of Holder norm?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You seem to think that the implied constants will be completely independent of our choice of Littlewood-Paley partition of unity. If you look at the proof of the standard Littlewood-Paley inequality, you'll see that the estimates for the vector-valued kernel depend on the LP partition of unity. For the upper LP estimate, we can say the following: for all mean zero, $C^{1}$ functions $\phi$ such that $$|\psi(x)|\leq B(1+|x|)^{-n-1},\quad |\nabla\psi(x)|\leq B(1+|x|)^{-n-1}$$ we have that $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\leq C_{n,p}B\|f\|_{L^{p}},\quad 1<p<\infty$$ Conversely, if $\psi$ is a Schwartz function such that $\sum_{j}\widehat{\psi}(\xi)=1$ for $\xi\neq 0$, then there is a constant $C_{n,\psi}$ depending only on the dimension $n$ and the function $\psi$, such that $$\|f\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{p}C_{n,\psi}\left\|\left(\sum_{j}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}$$
Having said all that, let's turn to what you want to prove. Let $\phi$ be a Schwartz function such that $\widehat{\phi}$ is supported in the annulus $\left\{1/2\leq|\xi|\leq 2\right\}$ and $\sum_{j}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}xi)=1$ for all $\xi\neq 0$. Define a Schwartz function $\psi$ by $$\widehat{\psi}(\xi)=\begin{cases}\sum_{j\leq 0}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi) & {\xi\neq 0}\\ 1 & {\xi=0}\end{cases}$$ Technically, you need to check that $\psi$ is a well-defined Schwartz function, but this is easy. Let $P_{\leq 0}$ be the operator given by convolution with $\psi$. We then have the following result, $$\|f\|_{L^{p}}\sim_{n,p,\phi}\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|\left(\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{2}\right\|_{L^{p}},\quad f\in L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$$ for all $1<p<\infty$.
Observe that the identity $P_{\leq 0}+\sum_{j\geq 1}P_{j}$ holds for all Schwartz functions $f\in\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$. Indeed, by our hypothesis that $\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)=1$, $\xi\neq 0$, we have that for $\xi\neq 0$, $$\widehat{f}(\xi)=\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)\widehat{f}(\xi)=\sum_{j\leq 0}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)\widehat{f}(\xi)+\sum_{j\geq 1}\widehat{P_{j}f}(\xi)=\widehat{P_{\leq 0}f}(\xi)+\sum_{j\geq 1}\widehat{P_{j}f}(\xi)$$ By nonnegativity, $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\leq\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{n,p,\psi}\|f\|_{L^{p}}$$ By Young's inequality, $$\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}\leq\|\psi\|_{L^{1}}\|f\|_{L^{p}}$$ These two estimates together with Minkowski's inequality give us one side of the inequality.
We now show the other side of the inequality. We have the trivial estimate $$\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\geq|P_{1}f|,$$ which implies by Minkowski that $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|P_{\leq 0}f\right\|_{L^{p}}\geq\left\|P_{\leq 1}f\right\|_{L^{p}}$$ Now by the support properties of $\widehat{\psi}$, we have that $P_{k}P_{\leq 1}=P_{k}$ if $k\leq 0$. Whence, $$\left(\sum_{k\leq0}|P_{k}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\leq\left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{k}P_{\leq 1}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}$$ Taking $L^{p}$ norms and using the standard two-sided LP inequality, we obtain $$\left\|\left(\sum_{k\leq 0}|P_{k}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\left\|P_{\leq 1}f\right\|_{L^{p}}$$ Putting these results together and using Minkowski's inequality and two-sided LP inequality again, we conclude that \begin{align*} \|f\|_{L^{p}}&\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\\ &\leq\left\|\left(\sum_{j\leq 0}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\\ &\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}+2\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}} \end{align*}