For any $p\in(1,\infty)$ there holds the Littlewood-Paley inequality $$ \Vert f\Vert_{L^p}\sim_{n,p}\left\Vert \left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\left\vert \dot P_kf(x)\right\vert^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\right\Vert_{L^p}$$ with the Littlewood-Paley projections $\dot P_kf$ defined by $\widehat{\dot P_kf}=\psi_k\widehat{f}$, where $\mathrm{Supp}(\psi_k)\subset\{2^{k-1}\leq\vert\xi\vert \leq2^{k+1}\}$ and $\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\psi_k(x)=1$ for $x\neq 0$. If I alternatively define the projections $P_kf$ by $P_kf=\dot P_kf$ for $k\geq1$ and $\widehat{P_0f}=\phi\widehat{f}$ with a bump function $\phi$ with support around the origin and $\phi+\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\psi_k=1$. Does there also hold the similar inequality $$\Vert f\Vert_{L^p}\sim_{n,p}\left\Vert \left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}_0}\left\vert P_kf(x)\right\vert^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\right\Vert_{L^p}?$$
2025-01-13 05:29:56.1736746196
Version of Littlewood-Paley inequality
1.5k Views Asked by lbf_1994 https://math.techqa.club/user/lbf-1994/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- Proving whether the limit of a sequence will always converge to 0?
- Limit of $(5n^2+2n)/(n^2-3)$ using limit definition
- If $\inf f = f(a)$, then $\exists b,c$, $f(b) = f(c)$
- Trying to prove if $S$ is a subset of $R$, every adherent point to $S$ is the limit of a sequence in $S$
- ODE existence of specific solutions
- equivalent definitions of weak topology on a topological vector space
- Bounded derivative implies uniform continuity on an open interval
- Inf and Sup question
- how to prove sup(A) where A={(n+1)/n|n∈N}?
- how to use epsilion-delta limit definition to answer the following question?
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- The distribution of fourier coefficients of a Rademacher sequence
- Effect of sampling frequency on Discrete Fourier Transform?
- Fourier transform to determine stability of fixpoint of equation with temporal convolution
- Find Fourier transform of triangular function based on a Fourier results of rectangular
- Let $f\in C^1[-\pi ,\pi]$ be such that $f(-\pi)=f(\pi)$Show that $\{na_n\} $ is convergent to $0$
- Is this Fourier Transform relation correct?
- What are all functions of the form $\frac{\cosh(\alpha x)}{\cosh x+c}$ self-reciprocal under Fourier transform?
- Use the Inverse Fourier transform to show the Dirac-Delta function as a limit of the sinc function
- Compute Fourier Transform using conditional expectation
- A question involving sharpening the bound on Sobolev type inequality with Sobolev spaces in terms of distributions of Schwartz functions
Related Questions in LITTLEWOOD-PALEY-THEORY
- Littlewood-Paley theorem at endpoints
- where to find a proof of Littlewood-Paley theorem by Khintchine's inequality
- Continuous Littlewood-Paley Inequality
- Version of Littlewood-Paley inequality
- Fractional Sobolev Space Trace Inequality
- Relation between Besov and Sobolev spaces (Littlewood-Paley-theory)
- Critical Homogeneous Sobolev Embedding
- $W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ Is Not Closed Under Multiplication when $s\leq n/p$
- Proving Div-Curl Lemma through Paraproducts
- $L^p$-norm estimate of Littlewood-Paley multiplier operator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
You seem to think that the implied constants will be completely independent of our choice of Littlewood-Paley partition of unity. If you look at the proof of the standard Littlewood-Paley inequality, you'll see that the estimates for the vector-valued kernel depend on the LP partition of unity. For the upper LP estimate, we can say the following: for all mean zero, $C^{1}$ functions $\phi$ such that $$|\psi(x)|\leq B(1+|x|)^{-n-1},\quad |\nabla\psi(x)|\leq B(1+|x|)^{-n-1}$$ we have that $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\leq C_{n,p}B\|f\|_{L^{p}},\quad 1<p<\infty$$ Conversely, if $\psi$ is a Schwartz function such that $\sum_{j}\widehat{\psi}(\xi)=1$ for $\xi\neq 0$, then there is a constant $C_{n,\psi}$ depending only on the dimension $n$ and the function $\psi$, such that $$\|f\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{p}C_{n,\psi}\left\|\left(\sum_{j}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}$$
Having said all that, let's turn to what you want to prove. Let $\phi$ be a Schwartz function such that $\widehat{\phi}$ is supported in the annulus $\left\{1/2\leq|\xi|\leq 2\right\}$ and $\sum_{j}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}xi)=1$ for all $\xi\neq 0$. Define a Schwartz function $\psi$ by $$\widehat{\psi}(\xi)=\begin{cases}\sum_{j\leq 0}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi) & {\xi\neq 0}\\ 1 & {\xi=0}\end{cases}$$ Technically, you need to check that $\psi$ is a well-defined Schwartz function, but this is easy. Let $P_{\leq 0}$ be the operator given by convolution with $\psi$. We then have the following result, $$\|f\|_{L^{p}}\sim_{n,p,\phi}\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|\left(\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{2}\right\|_{L^{p}},\quad f\in L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$$ for all $1<p<\infty$.
Observe that the identity $P_{\leq 0}+\sum_{j\geq 1}P_{j}$ holds for all Schwartz functions $f\in\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$. Indeed, by our hypothesis that $\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)=1$, $\xi\neq 0$, we have that for $\xi\neq 0$, $$\widehat{f}(\xi)=\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)\widehat{f}(\xi)=\sum_{j\leq 0}\widehat{\phi}(2^{-j}\xi)\widehat{f}(\xi)+\sum_{j\geq 1}\widehat{P_{j}f}(\xi)=\widehat{P_{\leq 0}f}(\xi)+\sum_{j\geq 1}\widehat{P_{j}f}(\xi)$$ By nonnegativity, $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\leq\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{n,p,\psi}\|f\|_{L^{p}}$$ By Young's inequality, $$\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}\leq\|\psi\|_{L^{1}}\|f\|_{L^{p}}$$ These two estimates together with Minkowski's inequality give us one side of the inequality.
We now show the other side of the inequality. We have the trivial estimate $$\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\geq|P_{1}f|,$$ which implies by Minkowski that $$\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|P_{\leq 0}f\right\|_{L^{p}}\geq\left\|P_{\leq 1}f\right\|_{L^{p}}$$ Now by the support properties of $\widehat{\psi}$, we have that $P_{k}P_{\leq 1}=P_{k}$ if $k\leq 0$. Whence, $$\left(\sum_{k\leq0}|P_{k}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\leq\left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{k}P_{\leq 1}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}$$ Taking $L^{p}$ norms and using the standard two-sided LP inequality, we obtain $$\left\|\left(\sum_{k\leq 0}|P_{k}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\left\|P_{\leq 1}f\right\|_{L^{p}}$$ Putting these results together and using Minkowski's inequality and two-sided LP inequality again, we conclude that \begin{align*} \|f\|_{L^{p}}&\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\left\|\left(\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\\ &\leq\left\|\left(\sum_{j\leq 0}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}+\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}}\\ &\lesssim_{n,p,\phi}\|P_{\leq 0}f\|_{L^{p}}+2\left\|\left(\sum_{j\geq 1}|P_{j}f|^{2}\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{p}} \end{align*}