I am trying to find the volume of a loop of the lemniscate $r^{2}=a^{2}\sin2\theta$ when rotated about the line $y=x$. Is it possible to do this using only high school methods? (i.e taking washers/slices or cylindrical shells).
My first thought was to take slices perpendicular to the line $y=x$ of radius $\left|\frac{x-y}{\sqrt{2}}\right|$ (perpendicular distance of point to line y=x). However the cartesian equation of the lemniscate is $(x^{2}+y^{2})^{2}=a^{2}(y^{2}-x^{2})$, which I can't seem to express nicely in terms of $y$ so that I can calculate the volume using an integral with respect to $x$.
I then thought of rotating the lemniscate $\frac{\pi}{4}$ clockwise to the curve $r^{2}=a^{2}\cos2\theta$ and using cylindrical shells or slices but again I ran into the problem of trying to express $y$ in terms of $x$ (using the quadratic formula gave me the square root of a quartic which doesn't seem integrable). I know there are approximations I can use, but I just want to know if this problem is possible with only these basic methods (washers/slices and cylindrical shells) and not Pappus's centroid theorem which I have learnt yet.
Thanks

Part 1: Volume of Lemniscate by integrating with respect to $r$
Given the rotational symmetry around the x-axis the volume of a Lemniscate [ defined by $r^2=a^2\cos(2\theta)$ ] $V$ can be determined using the integral below $$V=2\pi \int_0^a y^2\;dx$$ which may be expanded as $$V=V_1-V_2= \left(2\pi \int_0^a r^2\;dx \right)-\left(2\pi \int_0^a x^2\;dx \right)$$ Finding $V_2$ is straight forward the answer being $V_2=\frac{2\pi a^3}{3}$
The $V_1$ integral can (with a lot of work) be transformed to an integral w.r.t. $r$. Since $x=r\cos(\theta)$ we first need to rewrite $\cos(\theta)$ as a function of $r$. This can be done using the defining equation $r^2=a^2\cos(2\theta)$ and the identity $\cos(2\theta)=2\cos^2(\theta)-1$ giving
$$x=\frac{r}{\sqrt{2}\;a}\sqrt{a^2+r^2}$$
which can be differentiated w.t.r. $r$ giving $$dx= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\;a} \left( \frac{r^2}{\sqrt{a^2+r^2}}+\sqrt{a^2+r^2}\right) dr$$
$V_1$ can now be rewritten in terms of $a$ and $r$ only $$V_1=\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{2}\; a} \int_0^a \left( \frac{r^2}{\sqrt{a^2+r^2}}+\sqrt{a^2+r^2}\right) dr $$ and integrated $$V_1=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}\; a}\left[ \left( 2r^3-a^2r\right) \sqrt{a^2+r^2}+a^4 \log(r+\sqrt{a^2+r^2})\right]_0^a$$ with the final result for $V_1$ $$V_1=\frac{\pi a^3}{2}+\frac{\pi a^3}{2 \sqrt{2}} \log(1+\sqrt{2})$$ Therefore $$ V=V_1-V_2= \frac{\pi a^3}{2}+\frac{\pi a^3}{2 \sqrt{2}} \log(1+\sqrt{2}) - \frac{2\pi a^3}{3} $$ $$ V= -\frac{\pi a^3}{6}+\frac{\pi a^3}{2 \sqrt{2}} \log(1+\sqrt{2})$$
In agreement with B. Goddard's result.
Part 2: Is there a simpler route?
In messing about with this problem whilst getting the derivation profoundly wrong I found a simpler integral w.r.t. r which leads to the same result as above
$$ V=\frac{4\pi a^3}{3}-\frac{4 \pi}{a \sqrt{2}} \int_0^a \left( r^2 \sqrt{a^2+r^2}\right) dr$$
I have to be honest I don't understand this but seems to arise from the integral
$$V=V_1-V_2=\left(4\pi \int_0^a x^2\;dx \right)-\left(4\pi \int_0^a r^2 \cos(\theta)\;dr \right)$$ with $\cos(\theta)$ defined as above. How one correctly derives and interprets this last formula I do not know.