I don't understand why this statement in lecture is true :
let $\gamma : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \left \{ p\right \} $ a continuous path, and v any vector in the plane. Moreover, let $\gamma$ +v be the path defined by
$(\gamma + v)(t) = \gamma(t) + v $
it follows that
$W(\gamma +v , p+ v) = W(\gamma, p)$
in this sense we say that winding numbers are invariant under translation.
But why does this follow? Do I have to use some Linear Algebra to get there ? Could someone maybe explain to me why this statement is true ? Thank you very much.
Identifying $\mathbb{R}^2$ with $\mathbb{C}$ in the natural way:\begin{eqnarray*}W(\gamma +v , p+ v) &=&\frac1{2\pi i}\int_a^b \frac1{(\gamma+v)t-(p+v)}\frac{d(\gamma+v)}{dt}dt\\ &=&\frac1{2\pi i}\int_a^b \frac1{\gamma(t)-p}\frac{d\gamma}{dt}dt\\ &=&W(\gamma, p)\end{eqnarray*}