I want to ask a seemingly easy question, but I have no idea how to show it. Let $X$ be a locally convex space over $F$. $\{T_n\}$ be a sequence in $X^\star$ and $T\in X^\star$. I know $\{T_n\}$ is called weak $\star$ convergent to $T$ if $\lim_{n\to\infty}T_n(x)=T(x)$ for all $x\in X$. On the other hand, from $X$, we can construct a weak $\star$ topology of $X^\star$ by seminorms $\{x^\star\mapsto x^\star(x)\mid x\in X\}$. However, how to prove that $\{T_n\}$ is weak $\star$ convergent to $T$ iff $\{T_n\}$ is convergent (as a sequence in the space $X^\star$) with respect to the weak $\star$ topology?
2026-03-27 04:57:10.1774587430
Weak* convergence in terms of weak* topology
215 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in WEAK-CONVERGENCE
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- Does $X_n\xrightarrow[n\to+\infty]{law} 0$ imply$\mathbb{E}\left(\log |1-X_n| \right)\xrightarrow[n\to +\infty]{} 0$?
- If $X_n\rightarrow X$ in distribution, how to show that $\mathbb{P}(X_n=x)\rightarrow 0$ if $F$ is continuous at $x$?
- Equivalence of weak convergences
- Weak convergence under linear operators
- Convergence of Probability Measures and Respective Distribution Functions
- Convergence in distribution of uniform
- Convergence of Maximum of Cauchy Random Variables
- Weak Convergence Confusion
Related Questions in WEAK-TOPOLOGY
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Question about a projection and weak topology
- Element of weak closure by compact conditions
- When does two random measures coincide in distribution?
- Unit ball in dual space is weak*separable
- Unit ball of the adjoint space of a separable Banach space is second-countable in the weak* topology.
- If $X$ is finite dimensional, what is an explicit metric inducing the weak topology on $X?$
- Mazur's theorem counterexample for the weak-$*$ topology
- Weak closed in Sobolev space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You need a description of a system of basic weak-star neighborhoods of a point $\phi\in X^*$.
Such a description is given by the sets $$V_\phi(\varepsilon, F):=\{\psi\in X^*: |\psi(x)-\phi(x)|<\varepsilon\text{ for all }x\in F\}$$ where $\varepsilon$ ranges in $(0,\infty)$ and $F$ ranges in the finite subsets of $X$. It is elementary to verify that the collection $\{V_\phi(\varepsilon,F)\}_{\varepsilon,F}$ forms a system of basic neighborhoods for $\phi$ for the weak-star topology (in the sense that, each $V_\phi(\varepsilon,F)$ is a neighborhood of $\phi$ and each neighborhood of $\phi$ contains a neighborhood of the form $V_\phi(\varepsilon,F)$).
With that in hand, assume that $\phi_n\to\phi$ in the sense that $\phi_n(x)\to\phi(x)$ for all $x\in X$. If we fix $\varepsilon>0$ and $F\subset X$ a finite set, then we can find $n_0$ so that for all $n\geq n_0$ we have that $|\phi_n(x)-\phi(x)|<\varepsilon$ for all $x\in F$. This shows that $\phi_n\in V_\phi(\varepsilon,F)$ for all $n\geq n_0$ and since $\{V_\varphi(\varepsilon,F)\}$ is a basic neighborhood system for $\phi$ for the weak-star topology, this shows that $\phi_n\to\phi$ in the weak-star topology.
Conversely, assume that $\phi_n\to\phi$ in the weak-star topology. Then, if $\varepsilon>0$ and $F\subset X$ is finite, we can find $n_0$ so that $|\phi_n(x)-\phi(x)|<\varepsilon$ for all $x\in F$. Fix $x_0\in X$ and let $\varepsilon>0$. Take $F=\{x_0\}$ and find such $n_0$, so you get $|\phi_n(x_0)-\phi(x_0)|<\varepsilon$ for all $n\geq n_0$, i.e. $\phi_n(x_0)\to\phi(x_0)$.