So I'm trying to show that weakly compact sets in $\ell_1$ are norm-compact. I've already proven that weak sequential convergence implies norm convergence. I think the idea I want to go with is to take some collection $\mathcal{F}$ (satisfying the finite intersection property) in my weakly compact set $K$ and note that by weak compactness I have $\bigcap_{F \in \mathcal{F}} \overline{F}^w \neq \varnothing$. I want to show in fact that $\bigcap_{F \in \mathcal{F}} \overline{F} \neq \varnothing$. To do this I suppose I want to show $\overline{F}^w = \overline{F}$ (i.e. the weak closure and norm closure always agree). My first idea was to prove that $\ell_1$'s weak topology was first countable, but this turned out to be false. So my current idea is to show that the ball of $\ell_1$ under the weak topology is first-countable (I know it's not metrizable). I feel like if I can show this, then I can "inflate" the ball to include $K$ and then use its first countability to prove that $\overline{F}^w$ is determined by limits of sequences in $F$ and that we need not worry about nets in $F$, from which it will follow (because weak seq. conv. is the same as norm conv.) that $\overline{F}^w = \overline{F}$. Any hints would be much appreciated.
2026-05-04 12:22:39.1777897359
weak vs. norm compactness in $\ell_1$
757 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Related Questions in LP-SPACES
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- Understanding the essential range
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Showing a sequence is in $\ell^1$
- How to conclude that $\ell_\infty$ is not separable from this exercise?
- Calculating the gradient in $L^p$ space when $0<p<1$ and the uderlying set is discrete and finite
- $f_{n} \in L^{p}(X),$ such that $\lVert f_{n}-f_{n+1}\rVert_{p} \leq \frac{1}{n^2}$. Prove $f_{n}$ converges a.e.
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- Elementary use of Hölder inequality
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $F \subset \ell_1$ be weakly compact. By Eberlein–Šmulian theorem, $F$ is weakly sequentially compact. But weakly convergence and strongly convergence are equivalent in $\ell_1$, so $F$ is sequentially compact, and so compact, for the norm topology of $\ell_1$.
EDIT: The proof that weakly compactness implies weakly sequentially compactness is not very difficult. I use this article.
The main step is to prove that the weak topology is metrizable on a weakly compact subset $F$. For $n \geq 1$, let $x_n' : x \mapsto \sum\limits_{k \geq 1} x(k)y_n(k) \in (\ell_1)^*$ where $y_n=( \underset{n}{\underbrace{0,...,0}},1,1,...)$. Because $\bigcap\limits_{n\geq 1} \text{ker}(x_n') = \{0\}$, $d : (x,y) \mapsto \sum\limits_{k \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^k}|x_k'(x-y)|$ defines a metric on $F$. You can show that the identity from $F$ with the weak topology to $F$ with the metric topology is continuous. And because $F$ is weakly compact, you deduce that the identity is an homeomorphism. So the weak topology is indeed metrizable.
Then, you can conclude as compactness and sequentially compactness are equivalent in metrizable spaces.