I know that linear maps of the form $T(z)=\alpha z,z\in\mathbb{C}$ preserve angles between two complex numbers. However, I know that every $\mathbb{R}$-linear map can be uniquely written as $T(z)=\alpha z+\beta \bar{z},\text{with } \alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{C}$. How can I find the rest of the angle-preserving linear maps if there are more?
2026-03-31 19:12:58.1774984378
What are all the angle-preserving $\mathbb{R}$-linear maps $T:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$?
389 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Related Questions in LINEAR-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- A different way to define homomorphism.
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Find matrix representation based on two vector transformations
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- Assuming that A is the matrix of a linear operator F in S find the matrix B of F in R
- For what $k$ is $g_k\circ f_k$ invertible?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given two nonzero complex numbers $z$, $w$ denote by $\>\circlearrowleft\!\!(z,w)$ the counterclockwise turning angle needed to flush $z$ with $w$. This angle is determined up to an additive integer multiple of $2\pi$, and satisfies $$\circlearrowleft\!\!(z,w)={\arg}{w\over z}\ .\tag{1}$$ A real linear map $T: \>z\mapsto\alpha z+\beta\bar z$ preserves angles if $$\circlearrowleft\!\!\bigl(T(z),T(w)\bigr)=\pm\circlearrowleft\!\!(z,w)\tag{2}$$ whenever $zw\ne0$. It is clear that for a given $T$ the choice implied by $\pm$ is constant. Using $(1)$ the condition $(2)$ can be translated into $$\arg T(w)-\arg T(z)=\pm(\arg w-\arg z)\ .\tag{3}$$ Chasing the $+$ sign we see that $\arg T(w)-\arg w=\arg T(z)-\arg z$ for all nonzero $z$ and $w$, hence $\arg{T(z)\over z}$ is constant on $\dot{\mathbb C}$. Since $$\arg{T(z)\over z}=\arg\left(\alpha+\beta{\bar z\over z}\right)$$ this clearly implies $\beta=0$.
Chasing the $-$ sign in $(3)$ we first note that $-\arg c=\arg\bar c$ for all $c\in\dot{\mathbb C}$. We therefore can conclude that in this case $\arg{T(z)\over\bar z}$ is constant on $\dot{\mathbb C}$. The same argument as before then leads to $\alpha=0$.
We therefore can say that the real linear maps of ${\mathbb C}$ that preserve angles are $T(z)=\alpha z$ and $T(z)=\alpha\bar z$ with $\alpha\ne0.$