I read that there is a tradition in the Jewish literature of an approximation of pi given in the prophets was very accurate ($\frac{3\times111}{106} \approx 3.14150\ldots$ - difference of about $.0026\%$)
I'm curious what is the next ancient (>1000 years) more accurate approximation of Pi?
From the link given by Brian, Ptolemy obtained $\pi\approx \frac{377}{120}$ in the 2nd century. This is closer to $\pi$ than $\frac{333}{106}$.
$$\frac{377}{120}-\pi \approx 7.4·10^{-5}$$ $$\pi-\frac{333}{106} \approx 8.3·10^{-5}$$
The error has an integral formula similar to the one given by Dalzell for $\frac{22}{7}-\pi$ (see Series and integrals for inequalities and approximations to $\pi$), as well as a corresponding series with constant numerator terms.
$$\begin{align} \frac{377}{120}-\pi &= \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 \frac{x^5(1-x)^6}{1+x^2}dx \\ &=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{7!}{(4k+2)(4k+3)(4k+4)(4k+5)(4k+7)(4k+8)(4k+9)(4k+10)} \end{align}$$
Ptolemy's approximation is the mediant fraction of $\frac{22}{7}$, given by Archimedes, and $\frac{355}{113}$, from Zu Chongzhi. $$\frac{22+355}{7+113}=\frac{377}{120}$$
The latter is closer to $\pi$, but it is dated about three centuries later.