In page 4 of the following http://web.mat.bham.ac.uk/D.Kuehn/RamseyGreg.pdf the text says
In any graph the number of vertices with odd degree must be even. For this reason there cannot exist a red 5-regular subgraph of $K_9$ or a blue 3-regular subgraph of $K_9$. This implies that in a complete 2-coloured graph of order nine there must be at least one vertex which is incident to at least six red or at least four blue edges.
I don't understand why "there cannot exist..." and why in turn "This implies that...". For example, if I take inside $K_9$ a $K_4$ and paint it all blue, don't I get a blue $3$-regular subgraph? It might be that I don't understand what the author means by "blue $3$-regular subgraph". Could someone clarify?
He means you cannot find a subset of edges that includes all $9$ vertices of $K_9$ that is $3$ or $5$ regular. You certainly can find a $5$-regular subgraph of $K_9$-just take $K_6$. What he really wants to do is justify the next sentence-that in any two coloring of $K_9$ there is a vertex with either six or more red edges or a vertex with four or more blue edges. As each vertex of $K_9$ has degree $8$, the only way this could fail would be if you could partition $K_9$ into a $5$-regular red piece and a $3$-regular blue piece. The parity argument is enough to show this is not possible.